Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 45.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 18, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 369 Words, 2,280 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/21678/34-1.pdf

Download Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut ( 45.8 kB)


Preview Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut
.l..__l,lll___, ..... ___...i...........T...... _t..l.c—.._.
I ___ Case 3:03-cv-00069-CFD Document 34 Filed 08/17/2004 Page 1 of 2
I _
I ` L . .. wffj J ~
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E; 1
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT n H2
\ xl} F) Ll-=
I @:.:2222;; 2 No ;?2;22222.€“Eg’ 5 "
Z ° ‘ ..-¤ _%1s$z‘1§E1 mmm;
‘ 1E1‘ ·*¥·"#-il*l¢;Ii‘:. ,
I James Keeney ; I
I DEFENDANT : August 12, 2004 I
I 1>LAINTIFF's MOTION FOR
I SUMMARY JUDGMENT I
Pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., the plaintiff hereby I
requests that this Court deny defendant's April 26, 2004 Motion I
for Summary Judgment, and issue summary judgment in favor of I
the plaintiff. There remains no genuine issue of material facts I
and the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law I
. because: I
1. The facts known to the defendant at the time he submitted I
the arrest warrant application for the plaintiff did not I
establish probable cause for his arrest;
2. The defendant omitted material facts from his arrest _
warrant affidavit;
3. The charges for which the plaintiff was falsely arrested I
were terminated in a manner favorable to him; and I
4. The defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity I
for his actions. I
In support of this motion for summary judgment, the I
plaintiff offers the following documents: I
i
§
I

V3? ·‘·» .3);;,;;; ._ .. -









g ' Case 3:03-cv-00069-CFD Document 34 Filed 08/17/2004 Page2of2
3 A f · [ln
! a. Affidavit of Keith Johnson, with attachments;
I
i b. Affidavit of Diane Johnson; and
i c. Affidavit of James Keeney, with attachments.
WHEREFORE, the plaintiff respectfully requests that summary
A judgment be issued in his favor. !
l 1
( Respectfully Submitted
THE PLAINTIEF - i
i {
I
n ·‘._ _ _ 1
Keith E. John on
Inmate N0. 27 700
MacDougall C.I. {
1153 East Street South `
Suffield, CT 06080 I
Tel. (860)627-2100 _ {
CERTIFICATION i
N
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing motion ,
was sent this égg day of August, 2004, to:
Stephen R. Sarnoski a
Assistant Attorney General
MacKenzie Hall
110 Sherman Street
Hartford, CT 06105 5
th E. Joh n I
i
{
I
1
2 l
p _________.___________________,________t .__ . 1