Free Order on Motion for Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

{ ,.4 / q {L ' Case 3ZO3·CV·O€G§8-FFDD DOcument15 Filed (KZS7/€(?94
. "L ” —, `-r
I \ yyyy
[ \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _; _; ,_ ! M ____j A
~ wg
· DAVID BISPHAM : CIVIL NO.®%:O3CV58(CED`I I [Ji}
A 35 306 664 : Siffiri ````
l Petitioner, !,£"‘i‘ I "U~<-I OI
v. :
i IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION I
I SERVICE, E E
I Respondent. October 22, 2003
\
E NOTICE OF EXPLANATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER l
I
Q, a\ On January 9, 2003, David Bispham filed a petition seeking
\Shabeas relief. Specifically, Mr. Bispham, who was then E
A kincarcerated in state prison, requested that the INS take him
\€\ L into custody and remove him to his native country, Barbados. @
$\ S Petit§er5;s Traverse to Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time l I
\ h@ 2-; C
gj L I I_Qn 27, 2003 the Court issued a ruling denying Mr. I
it `spl*ém’£§§etition. Judgment entered on June 30, 2003 and the I
\ ;case_§as§_i§;sed.
§ L In September of 2003, the undersigned received from Mr. I
gk Qspham a copy of a Motion for Relief from Judgment. g Exhibit
Q It appears, however, that Mr. Bispham never filed the motion
_ Iwith the Court. I
In October of 2003, the INS contacted the undersigned and
inquired about the status of Mru Bispham’s case. INS advised
I
I
I
. I