Free Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 49.6 kB
Pages: 1
Date: April 20, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 349 Words, 2,285 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/21665/43.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut ( 49.6 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut
I ._.LI..__.,,___.Q..._.__............._..;.;._......... · 1 _ I _
· 1 Case 3:03-cv-00056-WWE Document 43 Filed O4/15/2004 P ge 1 of 1
RAI F1. ,/ \\ I - s
*1 . U O P 1
1
. ti I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E; g D
DISTRICT OF CONNECTI UT I ’”
1
101111 111 A10=00 I
DAVID E. CHARDAVOYNE, : C5 :03CV56 GVWE)
: U.S. H TRICT CQUBT I l
. BR1D· Ei"0ilT. Crlllri
· 1
v. : I I
1 THAl\/@8 WATER HOLDINGS 1 A 1
§omo&ta=.a1>, THAMES WATER ; 1 1
arg Al\/IIIDERICA rrsrc. z Aprrr 13,2004 1 g
_ LM U, A
I ;....§ - 1 I
_ -"‘”‘““ PIgIN'IS[€Ii`j§"S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY TO DEF I I DANTS’
` , A FA M6TI(§`/I?§§l`O DISMISS AND FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY PRIO TO THE
§OU:R“P’S CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO • _ MISS 1
‘`‘ S § Plaintiff David E. Chardavoyne (the "Plaintif1Z” "ChardavoyrI¢ ’) respectiiilly
W ag gugves, pursuant to Fed, R. Civ, P. 7(b) and D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(cl), for leavd ·· this Court to I
o A g 1
I Q cb ubmit his surreply in opposition to the motion of Defendants Thames 1 ater Holdings I
Lam N 1
—-——— 3 Z gncorporated and Thames Water North America Inc. to dismiss the Amended: Complaint for
I ·•-1
T giamproper venue pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) or, in the alternative, forI ransfer of this I
1 E
·(: §action to the District of New Jersey pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l404(a), dated Janu , 16, 2004 (the
1
\ A "Second Motion to Dismiss"). A copy of Plaintiff s surreply is attached hereto e- Exhibit A and I
the Supplemental Affidavit of David E. Chardavoyne is attached as Exhibit B. ·. dditionally, in 1
· the unlikely event the Court relies upon Defendants’ factual allegations, Plaintiff oves that the
1 1
I 1
Court permit the parties to conduct immediate and expedited discovery and It at it defer its 1
consideration of Defendants’ Second Motion to Dismiss until after such disd very has been
completed. In support of this motion and for the reasons set forth more full)I n the attached I
surreply, Plaintiff states: . I
» 1 - 1
{00067146; 2; ll03-2}
. 1 _ 1.