Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 17.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 2, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 432 Words, 2,813 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20583/19.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 17.7 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:02-cv-02132-AWT

Document 19

Filed 12/03/2003

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ROY SASTROM AND ROBERT KALMAN Plaintiffs v. JAMES CASSIDY, PH.D., JD., AND GARRELL MULLANEY, C.E.O. Defendants

: : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION NO. Docket No. 3:02cv02132(AWT)(DFM)

DECEMBER 2, 2003

DEFENDANTS' FIRST MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 7(b), the defendants, James Cassidy, Ph.D., J.D., and Garrell Mullaney, C.E.O., move for an enlargement of time to file their motion for summary judgment. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is currently due on December 8, 2003. To date the defendants have not received the plaintiffs responses to their discovery request, Defendants' First Set Of Interrogatories And Request For Production Of Documents To Plaintiffs which was mailed to them on August 13, 2003. In accordance with Local Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 37, counsel for the defendants is attempting to resolve this issue without judicial intervention. Counsel for the defendants has been diligently working on the motion for summary judgment. However, without the plaintiffs' responses to the defendants' discovery requests, the defendants are not able to meet the current deadline for summary judgment. Therefore, the defendants are requesting an additional sixty (60) days to enable the plaintiffs to respond to the defendants' discovery requests and for defendants' counsel to finalize the motion for summary judgment.

Case 3:02-cv-02132-AWT

Document 19

Filed 12/03/2003

Page 2 of 3

Plaintiffs are involuntarily confined at the Whiting Forensic Division of Connecticut Valley Hospital. Counsel has not contacted the plaintiffs regarding this motion for enlargement of time. This is the defendants' first request for enlargement of time to file their motion for summary judgment. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTORNEY GENERAL Richard J. Lynch Assistant Attorney General BY: _________________________________ Patrick B. Kwanashie Assistant Attorney General Federal Bar No. 09206 55 Elm Street, P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 Tel: (860) 808-5210 Fax: (860) 808-5385 Email: [email protected]

Case 3:02-cv-02132-AWT

Document 19

Filed 12/03/2003

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Defendants' Fifth Motion For Enlargement of Time was mailed in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on this 2nd day of December, 2003, first class postage prepaid to: Roy Sastrom Whiting Forensic Institute 70 O'Brien Drive Middletown, CT 06457 Robert Kalman Whiting Forensic Institute 70 O'Brien Drive Middletown, CT 06457

___________________________________________ Patrick B. Kwanashie Assistant Attorney General