Free Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 105.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 527 Words, 2,900 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20459/53.pdf

Download Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut ( 105.9 kB)


Preview Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut
I Case 3:02-cv-02008-SRU Document 53 Filed 02/12/2004 Page 1 0f 2
I I
l
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
THOIVIAS SABELLA and KAREN SABELLA. 1 CIVIL ACTION NO.
I : 3:I`}?. CVZIIIZIS [SRU]
Plaintiffs. :
I vs. I
NORTHEAST GENERATION SERVICES
COMPANY and NORTHEAST UTILITIES. : FEBRUARY L EIJLI4
Defendants.
AFFIDAVIT
I, Arnold .I. Grant, III, being duly sworn, hereby depose and say:
I. I am over the age of IS, and I believe in the obligations of an oath.
2. I arn e real estate appraiser, oertitied by the State of Conneetieut. I
have obtained the designation ot`IVIA1 Member of the Appraisal Institute.
3. My qualiieatiens as an appraiser are set forth in my report, attached
I hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
4. I was engaged to perfomt an appraisal of the property Iuiown as E?}
Dividend Road, Roeky I-IiI1, Connecticut. on behalf oI'Northeast Generation Sewittest \
. · I
and to give an opinion as to the fait rental value ofthe property. I I
I
iwetmzii
IZAHMIIIIII N I`I.|III1.1¥lZ]·Z -· I*;`*"|l?.I||,|r1_1|. b·¤r.n_·•.-t I
Atmrnrrs It Law Pmr OII·i.»:- Iirn I'I5-U
New II-v·:n.¤"1'tIII'¤1I*l l'I'|-Ii
Tele-;¤lu.¤r¤r· hll. T"'T.*.'¤M|
ll

Case 3:02-cv-02008-SRU Document 53 Filed O2/12/2004 Page 2 0f 2 I
I I
I I·
I
I 5. As set t`ert|1 in detail in my repert, attached as Exhibit A, 1 perscnaily I I
I perliarnted an inspectien el" the premises as el` the stated date. lvly empleyee and I else
I ccnducteti the activities described in my repnrt with respeet te the prcperty. I
I
I ti- All ef the infnrmatien eentained in my repert is true and accurate.
I
I T, Based en my inspecticn and analysis as set fnrth in my repert. I
I cencludettl that the annual fair market rental value nf the premises, hefere any changes
by the tenant, as eI`.Iune 1. 1900, was $193,050; and that the annual Fair market value I
I
el` the premises. as uf the same date, and after changes marie hy the tenant, was I
I $21 I,500. I else cenclucled that the annual fair market rental value et` the premises, I
hefere any changes hy the tenant, as nf`.1tu‘Ie 3, 2002, was $202,900; and that the
annual Fair market value et" the premises, as et' the same date, and alter changes made I
I by thc tenant, was $225,+500.1vIy epiaiens as te value are set ferth in my repert.
it
I .IIJ _. J II
eld . r ,
I
Su1:»scribedIanI:l swam te befere me
en this if Itiay et`FehrtIary, 2004.
I "" Q---:·“" i {
`IIII.¤' -· _: "'°I IIII -· Jin.-
Cemmissiener ef the Superier Ceurtf
Netary Publis ·
I Tvty Cemmissien Expires: gr"; file:
|r»ItI‘IIIIt2II 2
l- -`II Hmnllli E Tllll H °I.*IlI F rrr l:'I|`· fflturrlr Strut
·I'·¤·¤mr·.·rI .11 I.»I·.•- Pun Hlliu- Bus 1¤HII
Nw Ill;|\|I'fI, ETF Itniitu I·¤'Iu
`lihrplstmr JN0 ""-'I'It!II I