Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. ,,,, ,__-.__..__ .._...___.;,__ .....l....r. .—.;.»——
I I
Case 3:02-cv-O200§-WWE Document 31 Filed 05/24/2004 Page 1 of 1
.< H Q
QE)\ FII isp I
Zlllili MAY l'I A II; l8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USB QIZI I f · --
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
CENTERFOLDS, INC. : r
AND MARIO PIROZZOLI, JR. : NO.: 3:O2CV2006 (WWE)Lj
‘ lr TOWN OF BERLIN, BONNIE L. I
, I ‘ THERRIEN, IDA RAGAZZI, JOANNE : *
I
g WARD, JOSEPH ARESIMOWICZ AND : '
¤ DSLINDA CIIVIADON : May 17, 2004 I
2 I I
' ig "I‘~‘ DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT TO FILE REI PLY BRIEF I
Eg ni NUNC PRO TUNC
I I
i ii r
, 3 § Pursuant to Local Rule 7, the defendants, hereby move the Court for an I
I I
A enlargement of time of (4) four days, up to and including this date, in which to file their
1 ' FRI I
Ig`} Reply brief. I
The undersigned counsel had substantially completed the brief and had I
planned to file it on the date due, May 13, 2004, but was then home bound with an
unexpected illness for three days, from May 13-15 and was unable to finalize the brief
for filing. The brief was finalized on Sunday, May 16, 2004 for filing with the Court on I
Monday, May 17, 2004.
¤:>This is the first request for an enlargement of time made by this defendant
" ‘fr,s I
rwlive toithe geply brief.
l-M T
...3 <‘~¤
$1: >- C/'J ki;}
g