Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

A _ ___, Case 3:02-cv-O1991___5CFD Document 37 Filed O2/17[2004 Page 1 of 3 ,
A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F g m .
, ., DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
,=-. FORTIS CORPORATE INSURANCE ; mmf FEB A I ID 2: 20 A
A (as subrogee of TRADE ARBED, INC.,) : A, A., A In _P _ Y
A Plaintiff, 2 COURT A
: ‘ -"·•`l { J- ‘_,lj‘A£ J .
A -against— : A
A M/V LANGESUND, her engines, boilers, A
' tackle, appurtenances, etc., Q 1%, A :
A LANGESUND, D.A., ATLANTIC ICE : A
· CARRIERS, B.V., LOGISTEC CONNECTICUT, : A
A INC., and LOGISTEC U.S.A., INC. : February 12, 2004
A in personam, :
Defendants. :
A MOTION ON CONSENT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO AND INCLUDING ‘ A
·- March 12, 2004 IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS A
LANGESUND, D.A. AND ATLANTIC ICE CARRIERS B.V.’S MOTION · I
_ TO STAY PENDING ARBITRATION
Now comes plaintiff, Fortis Corporate Insurance (as subrogee of Trade Arbed, Inc.), and A
moves this Court on consent for an extension of time to and including March 12, 2004 in which A
to respond to defendants Langesund, D.A. and Atlantic Ice Carriers, B.V.’s Motion to Stay
Pending Arbitration, and states as follows in support thereof: A
l. That counsel for plaintiff Fortis Corporate Insurance has spoken with Patrick F. l
A Lennon, Esq., counsel for defendants Langesund, D.A. and Atlantic Ice Carriers, B.V., and F. A
I Peter Sachner, Esq. counsel for Logistec Connecticut, Inc. and Logistec USA, Inc. both of whom ~
consent to the requested extension of time in which to respond to defendants Langestmd, D.A.
and Atlantic Ice Carriers, B.V.’s Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration. A
A

| l
i Case 3:02-cv-01991-CFD Document 37 Filed O2/1,7/2004 Page 2 of 3 {
I (__) O
1 . . . 1
\ 2. That plaintiff F ortis Corporate Insurance’s counsel requests the aforementioned 1
extension of time in order to adequately research the issues raised in defendants’ motion papers, I
. 1
K and to obtain any necessary documents from its client.
3. That this motion is not being made for the purpose of harassment or delay.
1
( 1
Dated: Easton, Connecticut LOVEJ OY & ASSOCIATES
5 February 12, 2004 Attorneys for Plaintiff
1 Fortis Corporate Insurance
1 (as subrogee of Trade Arbed, Inc.) it
1 E
1
By: Ge {
Frederick A. Lovejoy (CT 03121) l
P.O. Box 56
Easton, Connecticut 06612
(203) 459-9941
(203) 459-9943 (telefax)
FortisExtension.doc ;
i
a
— I
. i
. __1

· ·‘ Case 3:02-cv-O19E%1.—§3FD Document 37 Filed O2/1(7/$004 Page 3 of 3
{ CERTIFICATION ll
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was sent via U.S. Mail on February I
' n I
I 12, 2004, ro;
I I
S. Peter Sachner, Esq. I
Tyler Cooper & Alcorn I
205 Church Street ` I
I New Haven, Connecticut 06509
Patrick F. Lennon, Esq.
Tisdale & Lennon I
10 Spruce Street
Southport, Connecticut 06890 I
Fre erick A. Lovejoy I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
3 I
I