Free Order on Motion for Attorney Fees - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 48.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 7, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 420 Words, 2,455 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20157/92.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Attorney Fees - District Court of Connecticut ( 48.8 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Attorney Fees - District Court of Connecticut
Y Case 3:02-cv-01960-QQB Document 92-2 Filed O1/06/2005 Page 1 of 2 P" U }»`n
l
y L A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FT§Ha&€E§
g DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
· ZUU5 JAN —b F? 3: aq
\ SEAN LOVE, ; . `
` Plaintiff E [LS QMLQJQH {GHR?
‘ H1:. § f‘T.. 53
{ v. ; 3:02—CV—1960 (EBB)
i TOWN OF GRANBY, DOUGLAS CLARK E
\ and ROBERT CASTLE, :
g Defendants : (
I RULING ON AMENDED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES f
y The trial of this matter took place on August 3, 2004,
i through and including, August 6, 2004. The Town of Granby K
l prevailed in it Motion for Summary Judgment based on lack of any
viable Monell claim; the Court granted a directed verdict in [
favor of Defendant Castle at the end of Plaintiff's case, as no
evidence of any wrongdoing was ever proffered against him during ·
Plaintiff's case; following deliberations, the jury rendered its I
verdict in favor of Defendant Clark.
On or about August 19, 2004, Defendants, as prevailing
parties, filed a Motion for Attorneys' Fees. No objection was `
ever filed to this Motion. An Amended Motion for Attorneys' Fees
was filed on October 5, 2004, which set forth the hourly rates
charged by each attorney and the number of hours expended on the
preparation for this trial. Also included were two affidavits of
attorneys who practice in the field of municipal liability and
Section 1983 civil rights cases, in which each attested to the
reasonableness of the hourly rate charged. As before, no
objection was filed as to the Amended Motion. \
l

` Case 3:02-cv-01960-EBB Document 92-2 Filed O1/06/2005 Page20f2
i
I _ ’ The Court agrees that an hourly billing rate of $135 is more
{ than eminently reasonable. However, a after thorough review of
E the billable hours, the Court has determined that the total
i amount of fees requested shall be decreased by 10%, due to
i redundancies in reported work, or "reported" work lacking any
i explanation therefore.
I The total amount of fees sought is $63,249. Decreased by \
I l0%, the total fees amount to $56,924.10. !
\ The Amended Motion for Attorneys' Fees [Doc.No.86] is hereby i
i GRANTED, ABSENT OBJECTION, in the amount of $56,924.10. The Clerk i
l is directed to close this case. J
y F
i SO ORDERED y/7 _
1 i
g?7`_”“*" r ‘
LEN BREE BURNS i
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I
Dated at New Haven, Connecticut this _£L_ day of January, 2005.
I
i
2
F
. 1
ri
K 1 r