Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 78.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: January 27, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 480 Words, 2,870 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20157/36.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 78.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
I ase 3:02-cv—0196Q-EBB Document 36 Filed 01/22/2004 Paget of3
. J _ C.) O
F I L E D `
Irma JAN 22 r¤ l= 221 I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CQ®g‘;·jr;j;{_; E- {232;; ,32;.]-
I msmrcr or cormscrrcu I rgR;U,;;m;;;,¢,2;2 ·.yg· I
SEAN A. LOVE : CASIE NO. 302CV1 960 (JCI-l)
Plaintiff : I
.,. E i
TOWN OF GRANBY, DOUGLAS CLARK and
ROBERT CASTLE I
Defendants . JAN_ ARY 20, 2004 ,
MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF SCHEDLI LING ORDER I
I The Defendants, Town of Granby, Douglas Clark anI1 Robert Castle, hereby I
submit this Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order an extend the scheduling order, filed jointly by the Plaintiff andI Defendants, dated
November 19, 2003. Specifically, the Defendants request extension of thirty (30)
days for deposing their fact witnesses. The Defendants suI>mit that the current deadline
for the depositions of fact witnesses is January 31, 2004. `Ihe Defendants, therefore,
request that the court extend the deadline to March 1, 2004.
In support of this Motion, the Defendants submit thaI the Defendants will be I
unable to depose the PIaintiff’s mother, Mrs. Bishop, until FIebruary due to her I
unavailability. The Defendants also submit that, pursuant tI> the Local Rule 9 (b), they I
!
i I
l
TF A’meltobeseTseTssseseesiegtee-2L2LiL;;% %r2( D FC`P Ti

2 2 TTS Y**1;oneieeeeee2sssse;e;i;L,TLLgggiggéeeI( Fiéééf

I I
ase 3:02-cv—O19&0§EBB Document 36 Filed O1/22€0O4 Page 2 of 3 _
l
l
have contacted the Plaintiffs attorney, William Barrante, and he has no objection to this
Motion.
Therefore, for the foregoing reasons, the Defendants request that the court grant
their Motion for Modification of the Scheduling Order.
THE DEFENDAN S,
TOWN OF GRAN Y, DOUGLAS CLARK I
and ROBERT CA TLE F
By: ..1. ‘ M! ALA.;
SEPHI ‘ A SPINELLA ,
» Ivester & Dal
72 Russ Street
Hartford, CT 0 103
Tel. (860) 278- 650
Federal Bar No'. CT24009 T
T
I l
l a T
SILVESTER & DALY E
72 Russ STREET · HARTFORD, CoNNEcTic:uT 06106 • (S60) 278.2650 · FAX (BGO) 727-9243
i . l

I I
ase 3:02-cv—019€!§EBB Document 36 Filed 01/%§2004 Page 3 of 3 I
* · ·‘ .- x_
I
CERTIFICATION I
I, Josephine A. Spinella, attorney for the DefendantsI, hereby certify that a copy of
the foregoing has been mailed, postage prepaid, in the UniIed States Mail, this 20th day I
of January, 2004 to:
Patsy l\/I. Renzullo
65 Elm Street
i¤.o. sox 718 I
y Winsted, CT 06098
By: , I A- grit //1 W I
i s - ; ‘· . sp NELLA
lveste & Daly


nai-love/modlf of scheduling order.O11904
I
I
I
SILVESTER Bt DALY I
72 Russ STREET • HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 05106 • (860) 278 2550 • FAx (BGG) 727-9243 ‘
I