Free Order on Motion to Stay - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. dtd ju IA.i°J('YV\·d`{"S"'d· ¤
N Case 3:02-cv-01920- RK D0CUm€m 154 Fned 12/1942003 @9dM ba
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT {__ f
{ FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ‘· __
i ) &..._\, [L] I- H.-, F3': is _`
_ DUNKIN’ DONUTS INCORPORATED, ) _ i '`'' ““
a Delaware corporation, and ) "ii, A Q » 1. 3 ·
i ‘ DUNKIN’ DONUTS USA, INC., ) I ` ‘ ‘ · -. [
5 a Michigan corporation, ) ,
s )
R _ Plaintiffs, )
- ) C.A. No. 302 CV 192-0 (MRK ga I
v. )
) .-.
4 DONUTS, INC., )
a Connecticut corporation, )
GRANDO, INC., )
a Connecticut corporation, )
GLENN STETZER, ) * ,
. KATHLEEN STETZER, )
G GEORGE GERMANO, and )
E JAMES MCMANAMA, )
. 1 ) =
5 Defendants. )
P ) DECEMBER I5, 2003
UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS DUNKIN’ DON UTS
`INCORPORATED AND DUNKIN’ DONUTS USA, INC., AND DEFENDANTS
. 4 DONUTS, INC., GRANDO, INC. AND GLENN STETZER FOR A BRIEF i
STAY OF THE PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
_ Plaintiffs Dunkin’ Donuts Incorporated and Dunkin’ Donuts USA, Inc. and Defendants 4
T .
_2_ Donuts, Inc., Grande, Inc. and Glenn Stetzer (collectively, the "Parties") respectfully request a
J
..-E-— brief stay of the pre-trial schedule through January I6, 2004 to permit the parties to engage in
settlementrliscussions. The Parties have conferred with counsel for Defendants George
i}·*’ Q.!
is Gegmanojaid Kathleen Stetzer, and they do not oppose this Motion. In addition, former counsel
•"€ ‘--~·° ._ " y
U ¤ ‘ ‘ .:
Ii foriéefendiints J aines McManama—who now represents himself in this matter—informed the
tb ii?
I can U? ,
t ;;» "
°"
A l
6) i
-I-2. ‘ I
I" 0 l