Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

i IWW .·..·;;I,p·»·", F "' V ' | ' ' ' ‘·* *-4-_
I I ‘ I : ·’ 3:02-cv-01920-MRK Document 113 Filed 10/27/2003` Page 1 of 1
i ‘‘· A I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
g FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT -
I I I
I DUNKIN’ DONUTS INCORPORATED and )
.; DUNKIN’ DONUTS USA, INC., ) CIVIL ACTION NO. _
) 3:02 CV 1920 MRQ I
` · · ·· Plaintiffs, — A — ) ,,__,
, ) {ij 2;; <-¤ F1 I
V- I si?. ez; I"
_ 2 ) FTI 5
' 4 DONUTS, INC., ) gg C;. Cl')
GRANDO, INC., ) if I
GLENN STETZER, ) "’ I
I KATHLEEN STETZER, ) . A
GEORGE GERMAN O, and )
JAMES MCMANAMA, )
a ) '
Defendants. ) OCTOBER 23, 2003 I
i DEFENDAN'I`S’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
/ Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)( 1) and Local Rule 9(b), defendants James
i
McManama and George Germano (collectively, "defendants") respectfully move for an extension of I
` : -·’ I
I ` I6 time until October 3l, 2003 to file a response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Their First
‘ .:5 5
Amended Complaint dated October 3, 2003. This is defendants first Motion for Extension of Time I
` I I
. I E with respect to this deadline. Counsel for plaintiffs has consented to this request. An extension of
it ‘ i it
I xl : f 5 as
. rs., C_,‘» I
1 {I u..!."' I g J"? Qi? ` I
- "—Y‘ Ei? §:' · I
E? rt 4.. Ii *
zz ¤ E ge =~ ·
cg § C:) D 2 I
2 ua
_ 34l802
____i
egzi g; 3; g; ·· be -- be -— as liii I iiiii I if if It in- if ii.