Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 154.1 kB
Pages: 1
Date: August 19, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 443 Words, 2,632 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20007/42-2.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 154.1 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
AO 85 (Rev. 8/98) Notice, Consent, and Order of Reference -- Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:02-cv-01810-AVC

Document 42-2

Filed 08/23/2004

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of
CANDIDO TORRES
CONNECTICUT

Plaintiff V.
JACK TOKARZ, ET.AL.

NOTICE, CONSENT, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE -- EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case Number: 3:02CV1810(AVC)(TPS)

Defendant

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c), and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, you are notified that a United States magistrate judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or nonjury trial, and to order the entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a magistrate judge is, however, permitted only if all parties voluntarily consent. You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent the court's jurisdiction from being exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or withholding consent will not be communicated to any magistrate judge or to the district judge to whom the case has been assigned. An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge shall be taken directly to the United States court of appeals for this judicial circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of this district court.

CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In accordance with provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, the parties in this case consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including the trial, order the entry of a final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings. Party Represented
All Defendants
Steven R. Strom

Signatures
Digitally signed by Steven R. Strom DN: CN = Steven R. Strom, C = US, O = Office of the Attorney General, OU = Assistant Attorney General Date: 2004.08.19 09:44:35 -04'00'

Date
8/19/2004

ORDER OF REFERENCE
IT IS ORDERED that this case be referred to United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73.
Date United States District Judge

NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED ON THIS FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Print

Save As...

Export as FDF

Retrieve FDF File

Reset