Free Order on Motion for Attorney Fees - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 46.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 23, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 329 Words, 1,953 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19949/32.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Attorney Fees - District Court of Connecticut ( 46.2 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Attorney Fees - District Court of Connecticut
· i i Case 3:02-cv-01752-CFD Document 32 Filed 08/20/2004 Page 1 of 2 P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTF¤gP Fai? _
i DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT wm$m w U
i Z I
, UU: AUG 20 ID 3; gg
l »., i.`.,`.. .`
, JOSEPH PALMIERI, ‘·"·*-jg,£»’j,;i2_i.? -p1a1m;1ff *//"~~~lé"U%·€£J. CK
-v— CIVIL 3:02CVl752(CFD)(TPS)
i KEN HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
d/b/a SPORT CRAFT BOATS,
- SPORT CRAFTER MARINE,
SPORT CRAFT, INC.,
ROBERTS ACQUISITION CORP.,
and STONE HARBOR MARINA,
-Defendant
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RE—OPEN CASE AND FOR COSTS AND FEES
The plaintiff’s motion seeking to re—0pen this case and the
costs and attorney's fees associated with his efforts to consummate I
I
the Settlement (Dkt. # 30) is GRANTED ABSENT OBJECTION IN PART AND `
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. Wherefore the Judgment stated
that the case was “dismissed without costs and without prejudice to
the right of any parties to move within 30 days to re—open the case
if settlement has not been consummated” (Dkt. # 29) and wherefore
the plaintiff did in fact move to re-open the case within 30 days
I as the settlement had not been consummated, the motion to re—open
the case is GRANTED ABSENT OBJECTION. The clerk shall restore the
E
saaa ;$;i;ii£i§¥?if???
aggigggzza

` w b Case 3:02-cv-01752-CFD Document 32 Filed 08/20/2004 Page2of2 l
i
case to the docket. I
i However, it is axiomatic that a motion for an award of
attorney’s fees must be accompanied by an affidavit which sets
forth, grtg gig, the customary hourly rate that the moving
attorney bills and the total number of hours expended. Since no
such affidavit accompanied this motion, the motion is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated at Hartford, Connecticut this 20*" day of August, 2004.
[s/ Thomas P. Smith
Thomas P. Smith
United States Magistrate Judge
. _2_