I *‘L"..'I H {il: I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Ԥ
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT NUSAPR lg F) 2.55
i ORIEVANCE COMMITTEE UF THE : NO. 3:w22£R19‘(PCD)_ _l€€T
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT : QYIYI g ln_.#1
T FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT :
I
i VS. ..2.,...,,
I WILLIAM L. ANKERMAN : APRIL II, 2005
i ANSWER ‘ A
i Respondent, william L. Ankerman, answers the Presentment herein, dated March 2,
i 2005, as follows:
N 1. Respondent is without sufficient knowledge as to the truth of this matter to form i
i a belief, and therefore, leaves the Plaintiff to its proof as to paragraph 1. i
§ 2. Respondent denies the allegations of paragraph 2. X
T 3. Respondent is without sufficient knowledge as to the allegations of paragraph 3 é
I .
I to form a belief, and therefore, leaves the Plaintiff to its proof. I
Q Further, Respondent staixs that conviction of a "serious crime," even a felony, is N
i insufficient, per se, as a basis for discipline. In the underlying conviction, I i
9 I
the Respondent's civil rights were violated, including ineff ective assistance of 1
counsel, and failure of proof as to the "wrongfulness" of his conduct. i
\ I
l
I
william L. Ankerman, pro se, respondent i
37 Montclair Drive i
West Hartford, CT 06107-1247
(860) 233—6703 I
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE W
Service is hereby by mailing a copy hereof, to: i
Hugh F. Murray, III
Murtha Cullina r
City Place I, 185 Asylum Street ,
Hartford, CT 06103-3469,
on April 12, 2005. /ééé22; I
\ I
william L. nkerman '{SqL""`* i
———————mm ...‘ . l i
Azasaaeéagazagags;saga;ss;sgzgazaaaszzQegg5Q¥;;;;;;;;;;;Ti_?i"""""_T_T_
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms