Free Notice - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:02-cv-02318-MRK Document 17 Filed O2/18/2004 Page 1 of 1
1
-
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTV ____= Lu {fyi
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT $~II,Ii%~ ‘‘1`
I Michael Mouring ; @mIIQ\E% A-q:5\ I
I v, 5 Case No.3@g%cvQ§l8(MRK)(WIG) Q
I Warden Zyrenda 2 IEEE ` I
B
I
I ORDER OE NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT I
I . . . . I
I On 2/11/O4, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Rule
I 7(a), D. Conn. L. Civ. R., requires plaintiff to file his I
I response to the motion within twenty—one days from the date the I
I motion was filed. I
I The court hereby gives express notice to the prg sg
plaintiff that “failure to submit a memorandum in opposition to I
[the] motion may be deemed sufficient cause to grant the motion, I
except where the pleadings provide sufficient cause to deny the
motion.” Rule 7(a), D. Conn. Loc. Civ. P., and that if plaintiff I
I
fails to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss or fails to 2
obtain an extension of time for filing his opposition within
twenty-one days from the day the motion was filed, the
defendants' motion may be granted at that time. =
If after full review of the unopposed motion and the I
complaint, dismissal is warranted, the motion to dismiss will be
granted, the complaint will be dismissed and the case will be I
closed. I
l
BY ORDER OF THE COURT I
KEVIN F. ROWE, CLERK
W
·—v -a-a —~P#asFEseseevxwagazzmaaeas§;;Q;;;;;;IIEECTT"E_E

_EE—E_¥E—E_¥E—E_¥E—E_?§—E_?`—E_EEEE_EEHE_EEWE_EEEE_EE¥a—Ei¥E—E_¥E—E_?"EEE"E”T"v_t‘vt·
f·~ a-a- =~~sma=¤s¤esazssea@22ewaaQggggQ;;;;;;i;iEYE`E_E‘”"v"v*vci;g§;;;;;;;;;;; ->a*