Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 28.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 9, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 375 Words, 2,380 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19864/91-1.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Connecticut ( 28.3 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:02-cv-02317-JCH

Document 91

Filed 08/10/2004

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PRISONER CIVIL NO. 3:02CV2317 (JCH)

JAMES McKINNON v. THOMAS HUNT, ET AL.

: : :

AUGUST 9, 2004

DEFENDANTS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPEAL OF JUDGMENT DATED JULY 23, 2004

By pleading dated July 23, 2004 entitled "Plaintiff Motion for Appeal of Judgment" with a Second Circuit Motion Information Statement received August 4, 2004, plaintiff pro se inmate seeks money damages. The motion is foreign to any practice familiar to defendants, but to avoid the risk of allowing it to be granted absent objection, defendants hereby oppose the motion. In this case, plaintiff sought money damages from prison officials after he was found not guilty, after hearing, on a prison disciplinary report for sexual assault based on the complaint by a fellow inmate. The District Court rendered summary judgment in favor of the defendants on May 17, 2004. See, Ruling and Judgment, Exhibit A. Subsequently, by pleading dated May 26, 2004 and received June 7, 2004, plaintiff filed a Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment, purportedly pursuant to Rule 59, F.R.Civ.P. That Motion is still pending. To the extent that plaintiff's recent Motion for Appeal of Judgment seeks the same relief, it should be denied. Judgment has already been entered in this matter and plaintiff's recourse is to appeal following disposition of his Rule 59 motion, unless the court construes his Motion for Appeal of Judgment as a premature Notice of Appeal. Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(i), F.R.App.P. Accordingly, we urge the court to deny plaintiff's Motion for Appeal of Judgment.

Case 3:02-cv-02317-JCH

Document 91

Filed 08/10/2004

Page 2 of 2

DEFENDANTS Thomas Hunt, et al. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: ____/s/____________________________ Robert F. Vacchelli Assistant Attorney General 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 Federal Bar #ct05222 E-Mail: [email protected] Tel.: (860) 808-5450 Fax: (860) 808-5591

CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the following on this 9th day of August, 2004: James McKinnon, Inmate No. 100770 Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Center 986 Norwich-New London Tpke Uncasville, CT 06382

_______/s/__________________________ Robert F. Vacchelli Assistant Attorney General

2