Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 96.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 20, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 440 Words, 2,841 Characters
Page Size: 614.4 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19819/146-3.pdf

Download Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 96.7 kB)


Preview Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:02-cv-02272-AVC Document 146-3 Filed 05/20/2004 Page 1 of 2 -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
CROWN THEATRES, L.P., )
)
Plaintiff, )
l
v. ) Case No. 3:02CV2272AVC
" ) Judge Alfred V. Covello
MILTON L. DALY, TAYLOR—LEIGH, )
INC., ANNE E. DALY, JAMES C. )
CELLA, G.U.S. DEVELOPMENT, INC., )
JAMES T. MARTINO, JAMES THOMAS )
MARTINO, ARCHITECT, P.C., and RCD )
HUDSON, LLC, )
)
Defendants. ) ·
DECLARATION OF SUZY HERRERA
I, Suzy Herrera, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declare as follows:
1. I have worked in Crown Tl1eatres’ accounts payable department since
April 1996. For the past two years, I have had the title of Accounts Payable Supervisor. Prior to
that time, I did not have a formal title as I was the only employee in the accounts payable
department. From the time that I began working at Crown Theatres to the present, I have
reported directly to Crown Theatres’ Controller, Cathy Normemnacher.
2. My responsibilities have remained more or less the same throughout my
tenure at Crown Theatres. They have included and continue to include: receiving invoices from ,
vendors and theatre managers’ getting approval for payment of the invoices from the relevant
managers or officers; keying the invoices into Crown Theatres’ accounts payable system;
preparing checks for signature; and sending checks to vendors once they had been signed.


Case 3:02-cv-02272-AVC Document 146-3 Filed 05/20/2004 Page 2 of 2
3. During Crown Theatres’ theatre expansion and renovation program, all
_ construction payment applications came to me to be processed for payment in the same manner
as other invoices. These applications for payment were generally given to me by Milton Daly,
Crown Theatres’ former Chief Operating Officer. It was Crown Theatres’ practice to cut checks
to each individual subcontractor in addition to the general contractor, and I was responsible for
I entering each contractor’s application for payment into Crown Theatres’ accounts payable
system and drawing the checks.
4. Prior to drawing a check to a contractor, I checked to make sure that the
payment application had received the necessary approvals. In particular, I checked to see that
the application had been approved by: Jim Martino, Crown Theatres’ architect; Bob Beacher,
Crown Theatres’ construction consultant; and Milton Daly, Crown Theatres’ Chief Operating
Officer.
5. Each of these approvals was required for the processing of payments. If
one of the required approvals was not present, the payment should not have been processed, and
I would not knowingly have allowed it to be processed. ‘
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 19th day of May, 2004.
l I I
-2-