Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

N ""_T"*T""' `_“;`"“`"`"““”“ "`_l” N_"l" ` “““““__¤
Case 3:02-cv-02200-CFD Document 46 Filed 12/ 1ENOO3 P g 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT N N .
CARLOS A. ARREDONDO, in his capacity : N
as Trustee of The 2000 Trust for the Grandchildren : N
of Carlos A. Arredondo and Mari V. Arredondo, :
General Partner of Arredondo Properties Limited : N
Partnership, :
Plaintiff, ; .
v. Civil Action N . 3:02lCV OO (CFD) N
CAESAR A. ARREDONDO, individually and in
his capacity as Trustee of The 2000 Trust for the :
Grandchildren of Caesar A. Arredondo and Carolyn : N
Abad Arredondo; THE 2000 TRUST FOR THE :
N GRANDCHILDREN OF CAESAR A. : N N N
ARREDONDO AND CAROLYN ABAD :
ARREDONDO, in its capacity as General Partner of:
Arredondo Properties Limited Partnership; and : .
ARREDONDO & CO., LLC, : N
Defendants. : N
l
SCHEDULING ORDER
The parties’ proposed scheduling order [Doc. # 41] is hereby PPROVE s modified
below:
Discovery will be completed by April 20, 2004. Discovery w”ll not be biNfu cated, but
conducted on all issues. The parties are allowed to serve 40 interroga ories, incl di g subparts, I
on each opposing party. The parties shall designate expert witnesses nd prdduc e pert witness {
reports by February 15, 2004. The parties shall designate rebuttal ex ert witnes es and produce
rebuttal expert witness reports by March 30, 2004. Dispositive moti ns shall be ii ed by May N
19, 2004.
The final lists of witnesses and exhibits will be due according o the cou ’s trial N
memorandum order, which will be issued at a later date. This case wi l belconsi e ed ready for N
trial once the trial memorandum is filed. The court will schedule a fi al pretrial o ference to be
held after the trial memorandum is filed. N N
l
N
N
N N
N

I I ` I
Case 3:02-cv-02200-CFD Document 46 Filed 12/10/ 003 P g 2 of 2

There shall be no extensions of time for compliance, except f r good ca s shown which
means events that are unforeseeable and beyond the control of any 0 the parties. his excludes
lack of due diligence in moving the case forward by all permissible cans with or without direct
court action. I II
{ I
SO ORDERED this f@y of December 2003, at Hartford, Connectic t. Q
:.- .I_;A».·•.@¤¥4lI·I'.g-..2-
CH'- STOIPHE FQ • 0 Y I
UNITED STAIS DIIST ·- I T JUDGE I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I E
I I
I I
I I
I I
`“__*"""I_ E— I