Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 57.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 29, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 489 Words, 2,829 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19740/20.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Connecticut ( 57.5 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Connecticut
I Case 3:02-cv-021%5MRK Document 20 Filed 12/@2003 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I., I-jg:
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT if? **4*
` |"*».J I
I W I Pfjjj;
DuPONT AUTHENTICATION ) f`_ ifi I
SYSTEMS, LLC ) Ti; E Eli? l ``’`I' I
Plaintiff ) QI ,___·¤,
I .
I V. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: I
I ) 3:ll2 CV 2193 (MRK) I
9 JAKKS PACIFIC, INC. ) r
I Defendant ) I
I ) DECEMBER 22, 2003 ‘ I
I PLA|NTIFF’S RESPONSE TO I
I NOTICE TO COUNSEL DATED DECEMBIER 4, 2003
in response to Notice to Counsel dated December 4, 2003, the
undersigned counsel for the plaintiff hereby submits the enclosed statement in “
response to the notice issued by the Court on December 4, 2003. The captioned
matter seeks recovery from the defendant for breach of contract in connection I
i
with provision of certain manufacturing services rendered to the defendant. The I
parties have exchanged written discovery. The parties have been attempting to ,
schedule depositions for the principals, both of the plaintiff and the defendant. I
The scheduling of these depositions has been complicated by the fact that the I
defendant is located in California. Counsel had been holding dates on the
possibility that the appropriate parties from the defendart would be in New York i
City, which would have reduced expense and logistical issues. Unfortunately the
anticipated travel did not occur. The parties are now trying to schedule I
i I I
I Q
`
I .
i I
i
r
I .
l
1
i i

I Case 3:02-cv-021{3-jVIRK Document 20 Filed 12/2452003 Page 2 of 3
I It
I depositions in California or by telephone. lt is expecwed that the depositions,
I either traditional or telephonic, will be completed by the end of February, 2004, at 5
X which point the case will be ready to be tried.
I Dated at: Westport, Connecticut -
December 22, 2003 E
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
I THE PLAINTIFII,
I DuPONT AUTHENTICATION
j SYSTEMS, LLC
I By lt$·"?\lt rneys/\ %
I (I-I ._,,_ _._ `
Alexander J. T em icki, Esq. " _
Lynch, Tiiembic .i,, artelon & Boynton ‘
225 MaIn`Street I
SUITS I
Westport, CT 06880
Telephone N0.: 203.227.6808
Federal Juris No.; CT 06889
I
I
—~—_
I
I I .
I I *
`
I I I
. I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I

X Case 3:02-cv-02193jV|RK Document 20 Filed 12/24l<2003 Page 3 of 3
{ H
{ CERTIFICATION `
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage
prepaid, to all counsel of record on this date, December 22, 2003 as follows:
l Bruce Robins, Esq.
\ Feder, Kaszovltz, Isaacson,
_ Weber, Skala, Bass & Rhine, LLP
( 750 Lexington Avenue
I New York, NY 10022-1200 ,
I (counsel for Jakks Pacific, Inc.) `
I Toby IVI. Schaffer, Esq. b
i Shapiro & Siegel, P.C.
* 162 Bedford Street
` Stamford, CT 06901 E
[ (counsel for Jakks Pacific, Inc.)
ALEXAN E . T EIVIBICKI N