Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 34.9 kB
Pages: 1
Date: October 24, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 245 Words, 1,553 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19734/40.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 34.9 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
i Case 3:02-cv-0218 -\/5IWE Document 40 Filed 10/23/ 003 Pzi§€°1%'i‘qi`?? '°“”i¢·l*“f"°"i"€l@...
1 _ _ H ( J pl I eélca/.-%*87901) l
l
I · I Tiff *= 0‘‘'`‘- I 1
l ln;. zi. l g
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT couar will tltll 1 ts A ltr 2 8
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
CAROL TRELOAR, ADMINISTRATRIX OF : e
THE ESTATE OF KENNETH TRELOAR : i
: CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:02cv2l87 (\V\’lfl§`)'C
V. :
1
EUCLID—HITACHI HEAVY EQUIPMENT,
INC. : OCTOBER 15, 2003
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and Rule 9(b)(l) of the Local
Rule ofigivil Procedure, defendant, Euclid-Hitachi Heavy Equipment, Inc, ("Euclid"), hereby
fdr an extension of time of thirty (30) days to and including December 1, 2003 to disclose I
I; .... {YW Q ` V
pri L'i,IS$ijexper;ct;IwimeSses.
(Q Tfge reason for this motion is that Plaintiff has disclosed an expert witness pursuant to
-..,_" Rule 26 on September 30, 2003. The deposition of Plaintiff’s expert is scheduled for October 23, I
if , @003. Euclid requires this additional time to fully review all materials and properly disclosure its
Q _, flexpert. l
st O l
QT: - l" The undersigned counsel has contacted plaintiffS’ attorney, Attorney Michael Burt’s, who
.I T
E g Edges not object to this motion.
i *§’q§ l
, °§
' Q I
at I 7
I
Harm-I1Sss41»I
.t»-.... ; ;-. . V __ __
.;.rt... 1 ;r. . __ *f i