Free Letter - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

, _ , Case 3:02-cv-O1 $53-JCH Document 39 Filed O2@/2004 Page 1 of 4 I
I I
I
United states District c66tt cage N6. 302 cv i62%i1?§§F;IW I
District of Connecticut MWMJ
I ZIIIIII FEI} ··Q ID I2: U2 I
I Dick Mattleson (Petitioner) I
I 80 Tremont Street I
Hartford, Connecticut I
06105-5069 I
AKA [email protected] I I
I AKA dmattB9 I
I
I
I
I
I Emile Boyle (Respondent) I
I
I 8354 Forrester Blvd
I
Springfield, VA ‘
22152
I
I AKA [email protected] I
I AKA liveride I
I
I I
I Letter of Intent to Object to Judge Fitzsimmons Order
I and Ruling of February 5*2 2004 I
I I
“ I
I I
I I
I I

I
D I ` I
Case 3:02-cv-O16?-JCH Document 39 Filed @(03/2004 Page 2 of 4 I
I
I — I
I I
February 6***, 2004 I
I
I
The Honorable Holly B. Fitzsimmons
I U.S. District Court
915 Lafayette Blvd
Bridgeport, CT 06604
`

Your Honor:
I I have received, through e·mail, your RULING and ORDER and need to respond
I immediately. I plan to file an objection, but will wait pending our conference call which I
I you have scheduled for February 13m, 2004 at 3:00PM. I can be reached at I
860/233/ 1 819. I may be in the field but will initiate this conference call as directed.
When the conference call is set up, I ask that whoever picks up the call, make several I
announcements such as "THIS IS JUDGE FITZSIMMONS CHAMBERS—PLEASE ,
HOLD ON FOR THE JUDGE". I ask that your assistants not say simply "HOLD ON
PLEASE” in a generic format so Emile & I do not know who is on the other end ofthe °
telephone. After hearing "JUDGE FITZSIMMONS CHAMBERS" we, Emile & I,
will then know for sure the connection was made and will wait however long it takes.
Your Honor please take as long as is necessary for the call---no time limit.
I Tax returns are not essential or required in prevailing on my side to show damages. In .
I proving my case for damages, I plan to show enough evidence to show that my business I
endeavors did exist, what I shipped through UPS, customer files and their purchases, I
I expenses, and my relation with EBAY. At this moment in Emile’s hands, he has 14 I
I months of my listing records which meet the benchmark of the $75,000 rule, prior to the
placement of the libel. Under Federal law, in a civil matter, I only have to show a
preponderance of the evidence in order to prevail. I am not required to show actual proof
I of loss in a libel suit. In order to win my case I plan to show my proof in the form of
I actual receipts of shipments to customers, what they purchased, their credit card I
I information for further proof, my relationship with EBAY. This will help the court I
understand what happened before the libel took place. I will then explain how feedback I
works on EBAY. I will then explain that aggravated malice would be enough to bring a I
I vendor out of business on an on-line auction site. I plan to have on hand case law right
I next to me to argue my case and be prepared. I

—m"*“¤* -Im.,...._,, ___, _____, I

. _ . __"-—-——_—__i——I
Case 3:02-cv-O1€2?-JCH Document 39 Filed O26)5/2004 Page 3 of 4 I
M I
I
Furthermore, I have a legal right, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to I
understand why the requested infomation is needed. It may be obvious, but to this day
Emile has refused to provide his reasons for reviewing my tax retums.
For the conference call I am asking for these 2 items in order to follow through with your
order:
l. Emile must state his reasons why the tax retums will help his defense. I may
challenge his reasons, which are permitted within the scope of civil procedure.
2. I need to have Judge Fitzsimmons show me which Federal cases make it i
_ mandatory that a tax return is required, and nothing but a tax return, to prevail
in a lst. I am not asking for the Judge to spend a great deal of time here, but
I simply enough to make the point. I have spent 2 years cracking the books on
libel and found no cases to support this ruling. But, I am not a lawyer and
believe in the theory of learning something new everyday.
If the conference call does not yield my 2 requested items, then I will request that your
ruling be withdrawn on grounds presented here in this letter. Emile and I will then be
able to argue this matter during Pre-Trial. Or, if, your Honor wishes to hear the argument
before Pre-Trial, I will not obj ect and will be prepared. I also ask that Emile present his
argument for your ruling. Q
If I am denied here and can not get the removal of this ruling, then I may have to take a
leave to file an appeal through the 2"d Circuit Court. My question before the Appellate .
I Court would be “Does the Petitioner absolutely must show, through tax returns, his losses }
or can he prove his case otherwise”.
Please do not take drastic steps as dismissing this case or levying sanctions at this time I
until we resolve this. I
_ I
y0l.lI' I
I C; i GU; ' ` Q}-E/L,
Dick Mattleson
Petitioner "-_` Q Lg
. I
R I
_“"‘“—·*1··· ______;_____,__Wg,______I

" ` ` Case 3:02-cv-01EZQ-JCH Document 39 Filed O2(0SÂ¥2004 Page 4 of 4
I
Courtesy e-mailed February SUZ 2004 _
—Judge Fitzsimmons Chambers l
—Emile Boyle
_ l
\ Mailed this Friday February 6th, 2004 from Hartford,
Connecticut:
Clerk of the Court
U.S. District Court ` g
District of Connecticut I
Bridgeport, Connecticut
I · £
I `
I Emile Boyle
E 8354 Forrester Blvd ‘
· \
- l
Springfield, VA
22152 ‘ I
The Honorable Holly B. Fitzsimmons l
Magistrate U.S. District Court
Bridgeport, Connecticut l
l
f"·- 1 `. i l
I (-t--—_ l
l \··— ejb Q, goo?
m /
"`“`“““T "'I"" ,,,,,_,,,__,__,,,_______________ i