Free Order on Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 48.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: January 14, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 419 Words, 2,433 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19555/33.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut ( 48.7 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut
Igskeets .¤l ;.e..e,H.___..1T_.m._I.i,i________...Ltis,..;_r.__ _ . , {
{ J 1 Case 3:02-cv—O1612-RNC Document 33 Flled Ol/13/2OO62CBi19[lQ@J¥v»Q0mp
t ` . rl ‘ u O O i
. \ 1
E TZ i t Ei? *$’
.4 § i ` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTE i ` L ( JS` `V
3 g ¤ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICU'I§,,,,
Q L. ' {Url} it- ,_r g Q
O
U - STEPHEN GOLD, : NO. 3:02C\{—_1_6I2 p pp D
_r¤ g ` pjmgmyjf ; r Lg- t;}.£1iZ.'{ll_jI—;‘;Lili [HL; E
E lg l : |`é.’··\i‘tii`U|\I.i ln!]
ttf ru
e to . V. :
E g r , ¤
S g DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC : =
O ES SAFETY, et al., :
4; A defendants. : DECEMBER 3, 2003
»—l (U
E E MOTION TO COMPEL
2 COOPERATION IN DISCOVERY l
is E -
E ; Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 37(a)(2)(B) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
(D O
U`)
E §~ . the defendants respectfully request that this court order the plaintiff to cooperate in discovery by
l
$1% Q making Himself available for a deposition, or to suffer the dismissal of this lawsuit. In support of Q
E Q <
Q this motion, the defendants represents as follows:
s E l
3 2 I5 l.- On December 31, 2002, the defendants sent a Notice of Deposition to the plaintiff l
“•·* -.-1 Ld `
tg fg; § l through his counsel, Attorney Robert S. Kolesnik. Prior to February 27, 2003, the scheduled
}¤ E E Z
E B g date of tlie deposition, Attorney Kolesnik contacted counsel for the defendants and asked that the
QJ KU T
PCI 'U ,
H lg _ deposition of his client be postponed. Counsel agreed. A copy of the Notice of Deposition is
iii hg gl i I attached at Tab A
{U ll) Cl ‘
on lg m
E, 8 l 2. On August 4, 2003, the defendants sent a Re-notice of Deposition to the plaintiff
an >‘ *" El
; ‘ through his counsel, Attorney Robert S. Kolesnik. Prior to August 28, 2003, the scheduled date
ti "¤ . ..";' Lf?
E - * §; pgif thedeposition, Attorney Kolesnik contacted counsel for the defendants and asked that the
E “’ 3 fi 21;`¥<~=
g E J3 E Qdepogitirji of his client be postponed. Counsel agreed. A copy of the_Notice of Deposition is _
.¤ ¤ P ; Z {TL" zljE§= 4
Z tr] as-iattadlredfat Tab B.
E _ gx- flfé
Z 0 , <\L ..,.
or n ··¤ resi- 1-
ds 4.-; s ia:
t
l
1
-- F =<4·:é -— >· r ts: --.-,-,- » A.>e — ---- -. . l I K.0-