Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:02-cv-00718-RNC

Document 218

Filed 01/27/2006

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : : :

LAURA GUIGLIANO, Plaintiff, v. DANBURY HOSPITAL,ET AL., Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:02CV718 (RNC)

CALENDAR AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER This case is scheduled for a second settlement conference with the undersigned on February 10, 2006 at noon at her chambers at 450 Main Street, Room 262, Hartford, Connecticut. Those in

attendance at the conference should be prepared to spend the remainder of the day at the settlement conference. I. PARTIES WITH FULL AUTHORITY MUST ATTEND. hereby ORDERED to be present at the conference. The parties are If a party is a

legal entity, not an individual, a representative of the party who is fully authorized to decide all matters pertaining to the case shall be present at the conference. The court will not hold A party may

a settlement conference without all parties present.

not participate by phone without express, advance approval by the court. In cases where a party requires authority from an insurer

to settle the case, the party shall ensure that an insurance company representative with full authority to settle the case is present at the conference. For a plaintiff, "full authority"

means final authority to dismiss the case with prejudice, and to accept in settlement an amount or terms down to the defendant's last offer. For a defendant, "full authority" means final

Case 3:02-cv-00718-RNC

Document 218

Filed 01/27/2006

Page 2 of 3

authority to commit a defendant to pay, in the representative's own discretion, a settlement amount up to the plaintiff's prayer or the plaintiff's last demand, whichever is lower. The purpose

of this requirement is to have in attendance a person with both the authority and independence to settle the case during the settlement conference without consulting anyone not present. requirement that parties personally appear is intended to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the settlement conference. Failure of a party with full authority to settle the The

case to attend the conference may result in the imposition of sanctions. See Nick v. Morgan's Foods, 99 F. Supp. 2d 1056, Counsel are ordered to advise their

1062-63 (E.D. Mo 2000).

respective clients and insurance company representatives of the Nick decision. II. EXCHANGE OF OFFERS AND DEMANDS. Settlement conferences

are often unproductive unless the parties have exchanged offers and demands before the conference and made a serious effort to settle the case on their own. offer to the plaintiff. The defendants have conveyed an

Not less than 5 days before the

conference, the plaintiff's counsel shall serve a settlement demand upon counsel for the defendants. The defendants are

encouraged to respond to the plaintiff's demand prior to the settlement conference. III. CONFERENCE MEMORANDA. Not later than five (3) working

days prior to the conference counsel shall submit to chambers of

2

Case 3:02-cv-00718-RNC

Document 218

Filed 01/27/2006

Page 3 of 3

the undersigned a supplemental ex parte, confidential conference memorandum. The memorandum shall be double spaced in no less It shall

than 12 point font and shall not exceed 10 pages.

include the following: (A) a summary of the expert opinions to be offered at trial and (B) a summary of the evidence surrounding the so-called "code event" at issue in the case. More

specifically, the parties shall outline (including specific times when possible) the events on February 17, 2001 which culminated in the decedent's cardiopulmonary arrest. IV. REQUESTS PERTAINING TO THE CONFERENCE. Any requests

pertaining to the conference shall be made to the chambers of the undersigned in writing, or by telephone confirmed in writing, no later than 10 days from the date of this order. Any counsel

requesting continuances, which will be considered only for good cause shown, shall consult with all opposing counsel before making the request and, in the event of a continuance, shall notify all parties of the new date and time. SO ORDERED this 27th day of January, 2006 at Hartford, Connecticut. /s/ DONNA F. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3