Free Jury Verdict - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 33.8 kB
Pages: 5
Date: February 10, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 445 Words, 4,035 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/18460/57.pdf

Download Jury Verdict - District Court of Connecticut ( 33.8 kB)


Preview Jury Verdict - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:02-cv-00618-MRK

Document 57

Filed 02/10/2004

Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ---------------------------------------------------------X GEORGE FOSTER-BEY Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------X JURY INTERROGATORIES AND FORM We the Jury, duly impaneled and sworn in the above-entitled action, upon our oaths, answer the following questions: Civil No. 3:02CV00618 (MRK)

1. Do you find based on a preponderance of the evidence that George Foster-Bey suffered an adverse action.

_____Yes

_____ No

If your answer is Yes, go to Question No. 2. If your answer is No, have the Foreperson enter a verdict for the Defendant, Postal Service, on Count One, and sign the Verdict forms.

2. Do you find based on a preponderance of the evidence that the Postal Service articulated legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for its actions relative to the Plaintiff, George Foster-Bey?

_____Yes Go to Question No. 3.

_____ No

Case 3:02-cv-00618-MRK

Document 57

Filed 02/10/2004

Page 2 of 5

Count One

3. Do you find based on a preponderance of the evidence that the reasons articulated by the Postal Service were pretext for race discrimination?

_____Yes

_____ No

If your answer is Yes, go to Question No. 4. If your answer is No, then enter a verdict for the Defendant, Postal Service, on Count One and sign the Verdict form for Count One.

4. What amount of compensatory damages, if any, has the Plaintiff proven by a preponderance of evidence to have been proximately caused by Defendant's discrimination?

$______________________

Enter the amount on the Verdict form for the Plaintiff, George Foster-Bey, on Count One.

Case 3:02-cv-00618-MRK

Document 57

Filed 02/10/2004

Page 3 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT CURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ---------------------------------------------------------X GEORGE FOSTER-BEY Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------X COUNT ONE ­ VERDICT FORM We the Jury, duly impaneled and sworn in the above-entitled action, upon our oaths, do find in favor of Defendant, John E. Potter, Postmaster General, against Plaintiff, George Foster-Bey as to Count One, race discrimination. Civil No. 3:02CV00618 (MRK)

1.________________________________

7.________________________________

2.________________________________

8.________________________________

3.________________________________

9.________________________________

4.________________________________

10._______________________________

5.________________________________

11._______________________________

6.________________________________

__________________________________ Foreperson

Case 3:02-cv-00618-MRK

Document 57

Filed 02/10/2004

Page 4 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT CURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ---------------------------------------------------------X GEORGE FOSTER-BEY Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------X COUNT ONE ­ VERDICT FORM We the Jury, duly impaneled and sworn in the above-entitled action, upon our oaths, do find in favor of Plaintiff, George Foster-Bey, against the United States Postal Service. We find that the Plaintiff is entitled to compensatory damages of $_________________ on Count One. Civil No. 3:02CV00618 (MRK)

1.________________________________

7.________________________________

2.________________________________

8.________________________________

3.________________________________

9.________________________________

4.________________________________

10._______________________________

5.________________________________

11._______________________________

6.________________________________

__________________________________ Foreperson

Case 3:02-cv-00618-MRK

Document 57

Filed 02/10/2004

Page 5 of 5