Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 23.3 kB
Pages: 8
Date: July 8, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,547 Words, 9,553 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/17471/1602.pdf

Download Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut ( 23.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:02-cr-00264-AWT

Document 1602

Filed 07/11/2005

Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. E. KIRK SHELTON

: : : : :

No. 3:02CR00264 (AWT) July 7, 2005

MOTION BY UNITED STATES TO PROVIDE NOTICE TO VICTIMS BY PUBLICATION The United States of America, through undersigned counsel, seeks an order from the Court authorizing the Government to provide notice by publication to the large number of potential victims in the instant case. The Justice for All Act of 2004 ("the Act"), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3771, was signed into law on October 30, 2004. provides certain rights to victims in federal criminal proceedings. Among these rights are the right to "reasonable, The Act

accurate, and timely notice" of public court proceedings, including sentencings. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a). The Act defines a

crime victim as "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense . . ." 3771(e). 18 U.S.C. §

Importantly, the Act recognizes that for crimes

involving multiple victims, the Court has discretion to adopt procedures that will not unduly interfere with the criminal proceedings. Thus, 18 U.S.C. §3771(d)(2) provides:

[i]n a case where the court finds that the number of

Case 3:02-cr-00264-AWT

Document 1602

Filed 07/11/2005

Page 2 of 8

crime victims makes it impracticable to accord all of the crime victims the rights described in subsection (a), the court shall fashion a reasonable procedure to give effect to this chapter that does not unduly complicate or prolong the proceedings. The United States submits that this case falls within the "multiple crime victims" provision. The "direct and proximate"

victims of the charged securities fraud scheme are investors who purchased the stock of CUC International, Inc. and of the Cendant Corporation during the conspiracy period, which occurred from as early as the late 1980's to in or about April, 1998. The United

States believes that there are many thousands of individual investors who purchased CUC International and Cendant stock during that time period. Thus, it will not be practical for the Government to identify and locate all investors and provide them with reasonable, accurate, and timely notice by mail in advance of defendant Shelton's sentencing on July 19, 2005. However, rather than seek a complete waiver of the notice provision of the Act, the United States proposes that the Court authorize it to provide notice by publication. Additionally, the

Government has provided notice of the date of the sentencing hearing to private counsel for the class of investors that brought a civil action for damages in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for damages against Cendant and other defendants. The Government has also placed information

about the sentencing hearing on the website for the United States

2

Case 3:02-cr-00264-AWT

Document 1602

Filed 07/11/2005

Page 3 of 8

Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey, as well as on the Yahoo.com website. In this case, the number of crime victims

is large, and as noted above, it is impracticable to provide reasonable, accurate, timely, and individualized notice to all of them. Notice by publication is a reasonable procedure that will

give effect to the Act and will not unduly complicate or prolong the proceedings. The United States intends to submit a notice in the legal notices section of The Wall Street Journal to read: Advisory: Victims' Right to Be Heard in Sentencing of Cendant Defendant E. Kirk Shelton Shelton, the former Vice Chairman of Cendant and former President of CUC International will be sentenced before U.S. District Judge Alvin W. Thompson. Pursuant to the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (18 U.S.C. Sec. 3771), any victim of a criminal defendant's fraudulent acts is entitled to notice of any public proceedings. Victims are also entitled to be reasonably heard in any public proceeding, including a sentencing hearing. If you believe that you or your organization was a victim of the fraud that was announced on April 15, 1998, you have the right to be heard at defendant Shelton's sentencing either by letter, email or in person by appearing at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse at 450 Main Street in Hartford, CT. Please contact U.S. Postal Inspector Patricia Mathews at [email protected] or Senior Paralegal Specialist Debra Elliott at [email protected] for further information. In January 2005, a federal jury convicted Shelton of conspiracy, securities fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud in connection with the fraudulent manipulation of the earnings of CUC, later known as the Cendant Corporation, for the years beginning as early as the late 1980's to in or about April 1998.

3

Case 3:02-cr-00264-AWT

Document 1602

Filed 07/11/2005

Page 4 of 8

For more information on the Justice for All Act, go to the website of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey at: http://www.uddoj.gov/usao/nj/victimwitness.html The United States intends to place this notice for one day, during the week of July 11, 2005. The Wall Street

Journal business office needs two days' notice for publication. The United States will contact the Journal immediately upon receiving the Court's order authorizing this procedure. As the

Act limits assertion of the rights enumerated in the Act to the crime victims, their counsel, and government counsel, defendant Shelton's position on this notice is not required for the Court to make a determination of whether this procedure is reasonable. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (d)(1). As part of defendant Shelton's

sentence, the Court may require him to bear the cost of a notice to victims. See 18 U.S.C. § 3555.

4

Case 3:02-cr-00264-AWT

Document 1602

Filed 07/11/2005

Page 5 of 8

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that the Court: (a) authorize the Government to publish the abovedescribed notice to serve as an additional notice of defendant Shelton's upcoming sentencing, to the large number of victims in the above-captioned case; and (b) that the Court determine that this, along with the other means of notification described herein, is a reasonable procedure to satisfy the Government's obligations under 18 U.S.C. § 3771. attached. A proposed order is

Respectfully submitted, CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE Special Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Norman Gross/s By: NORMAN GROSS Special Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bar No. 24933

5

Case 3:02-cr-00264-AWT

Document 1602

Filed 07/11/2005

Page 6 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. E. KIRK SHELTON

: : : : :

No. 3:02CR00264 (AWT) July , 2005

ORDER Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771, the United States seeks an order authorizing the Government to provide notice by, among other methods, publication to the large number of crime victims in this case. Under Section 3771(a)(2), crime victims have a

right to "reasonable, accurate, and timely notice" of public court proceedings, including sentencings. In this case, the

victims of the charged securities fraud scheme are individual investors who purchased the stock of CUC International, Inc. or Cendant, Inc. The United States estimates that there are

thousands of individual investors who purchased CUC and Cendant stock during the relevant time period. It will thus be

impracticable for the Government to identify and locate all investors and provide them with reasonable, accurate, and timely notice by mail in advance of defendant Shelton's sentencing, which is scheduled for July 19, 2005. Under such circumstances, Section 3771(d)(2) of the Justice for All Act gives the Court the authority to "fashion a reasonable procedure to give effect to this chapter that does not

Case 3:02-cr-00264-AWT

Document 1602

Filed 07/11/2005

Page 7 of 8

unduly complicate or prolong the proceedings."

The Government

seeks authorization to provide additional notice to the investors by publication of a notice in The Wall Street Journal advising potential victims of defendant Shelton's sentencing on July 19, 2005. The text of the proposed notice is contained in the United

States' motion. The Court finds (1) that the "multiple victim" provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(2) apply to the above-captioned case; (2) that it is impractical for the Government to identify all of the direct and proximate victims of the charged offenses on an individual basis at this time without unduly delaying the sentencing process; and (3) notice by publication, in addition to the other methods of notification identified in the Government's motion, is a "reasonable procedure" to give effect to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3771. Accordingly, it is ordered that

the United States is authorized to comply with 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (a)(2) by providing notice of upcoming court proceedings by publication for one day in The Wall Street Journal of the notice included in the United States' motion.

ALVIN W. THOMPSON U.S. District Court Judge

Case 3:02-cr-00264-AWT

Document 1602

Filed 07/11/2005

Page 8 of 8

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on this day I caused to be served copies of the foregoing upon the following via email, fax and United States Mail: Thomas Puccio, Esq. Hope C. Seeley, Esq. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Norman Gross/s Norman Gross U.S. Department of Justice

Dated: July 7, 2005 Camden, New Jersey