Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:02-cr-00062-AWT

Document 195

Filed 06/08/2006

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ------------------------------x : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : : JOSE COSME : : ------------------------------x

NO.

3:02CR00062(AWT)

MODIFIED SCHEDULING ORDER 1. The defendant shall file any motions, such as motions

to dismiss or motions to suppress, together with memoranda in support thereof, on or before June 30, 2006. The government

shall file its responses to any such motions, together with supporting memoranda, on or before July 7, 2006. The

defendant shall file any reply to any such responses no later than July 14, 2006. 2. Any evidentiary hearings or oral argument with

respect to such motions, or a status conference in the event there are no such motions, shall take place on July 27, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. The government shall, and the defendant may,

submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law by no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 21, 2006. 3. 9 a.m. Jury selection shall take place on August 11, 2006 at The parties should be prepared to commence trial Proposed voir dire questions and

immediately thereafter.

Case 3:02-cr-00062-AWT

Document 195

Filed 06/08/2006

Page 2 of 2

proposed jury instructions shall be filed with the court and served on opposing counsel no later than August 4, 2006. 4. Any pre-trial applications are to be referred to the

undersigned absent exigent circumstances or explicit authorization to the contrary. 5. Courtesy copies of all documents filed in this action

shall be submitted to the chambers of the undersigned, Room 240, 450 Main Street, Hartford, CT. 6. This schedule may be altered only by a superseding

order of the court upon a showing that the ends of justice are served thereby and that they outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 7. Any motion by the defendant for a continuance shall

be accompanied by a statement of whether, in the defendant's view, the continuance would adversely affect the defendant's rights under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161 et seq. and the speedy trial provisions of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. It is so ordered. Dated this 7th day of June 2006 at Hartford, Connecticut. /s/Alvin W. Thompson Alvin W. Thompson United States District Judge

-2-