Free Order Dismissing Case - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:01-cv-02133-PCD

Document 20

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

PAUL FREDERICK RICCIO v. WARDEN GEORGE WEZNER, et al.

: : : : :

PRISONER Case No. 3:01CV2133(PCD)(JGM)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL By mandate issued April 20, 2005, the Second Circuit vacated the dismissal of this action and remanded the matter for the court to determine whether plaintiff had satisfied the requirement that he exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit. On May 18, 2005, the court issued an order

permitting the parties to submit a memorandum addressing the exhaustion before the court issued its ruling. The copy of the order sent to plaintiff at the address on file was returned to the court as undeliverable. The inmate

information search feature on the Connecticut Department of Correction website indicates that plaintiff has been released from custody. Rule 83.1(c)2, D. Conn. L. Civ. R., requires a pro se party to provide an address within this district at which service may be made upon him. Because plaintiff has not contacted the court

to update his address since his release from custody, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the

Case 3:01-cv-02133-PCD

Document 20

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 2 of 2

court rule.

Any motion to reopen this dismissal shall

demonstrate good cause for plaintiff's failure to provide a current address. SO ORDERED this Connecticut. 31st day of May, 2005, at New Haven,

/s/ Peter C. Dorsey United States District Judge

2