Free Proposed Verdict Form - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 67.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 17, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 390 Words, 2,368 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/15479/45.pdf

Download Proposed Verdict Form - District Court of Connecticut ( 67.0 kB)


Preview Proposed Verdict Form - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:01-cv-02290-MRK

Document 45

Filed 01/19/2005

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. ONE PARCEL OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 32 MEDLEY LANE, BRANFORD, CT WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON (CLAIMANTS: HAROLD E. VON HOFE AND KATHLEEN M. VON HOFE) VERDICT FORM Please answer these questions as to each Defendant. A. As to the Defendant Harold Von Hofe 1. In this case, is your verdict for ___ The Plaintiff, United States of America, or ___ The Defendant, Harold Von Hofe If your verdict is for the Defendant, Harold Von Hofe you may stop here. If your verdict is in favor of the Plaintiff, please continue as follows: 2. What is the amount of the forfeiture you are ordering from the Defendant, Harold Von Hofe? If you are ordering a forfeiture of his entire one-half interest in 32 Medley Lane, Branford, Connecticut, you may check yes on this line _____. If you are ordering a specific amount to be forfeited, indicate that amount on this line $________. You cannot order both a forfeiture of his one half interest and a forfeited amount. 3. Do you find that the Government has established a connection between the property it seeks to have forfeited and the offense committed by this Defendant? _____ JANUARY 17, 2005 CIVIL NO. 3:01CV 2290 (MRK)

Case 3:01-cv-02290-MRK

Document 45

Filed 01/19/2005

Page 2 of 2

B. As to the Defendant, Kathleen Von Hofe 1. In this case is your verdict for ___ The Plaintiff, United States of America, or ___ The Defendant, Kathleen Von Hofe If your verdict is for the Defendant, Kathleen Von Hofe you may stop here. If your verdict is in favor of the Plaintiff, please continue as follows: 2. What is the amount of the forfeiture you are ordering from the Defendant Kathleen

Von Hofe? If you are ordering a forfeiture of her entire one-half interest in 32 Medley Lane, Branford, Connecticut, you may check yes on this line _____. If you are ordering a specific amount to be forfeited, indicate that amount on this line $________. You cannot order both a forfeiture of her one half interest and a forfeited amount. 3. Do you find that the Government has established a connection between the property it seeks to have forfeited and the offense committed by this Defendant? ______ ______________________________ Foreperson Dated: _________________________