Free answer - California

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IN RE DIET DRUG LITIGATION 15 [PLAINTIFF[S]], 16 Plaintiff[s], 17 vs. 18 [DEFENDANTS] 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JCCP-4032-[JCCP NO.] CASE NO. [CASE NO.] NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF [FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE DEFENDANTS', PHENTERMINE DEFENDANTS' OR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER DEFENDANTS'] MASTER ANSWER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Attorneys for Defendant[s]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

COME[S] NOW defendant[s] [DEFENDANT[S]], and in accordance with Section I(B)(2) of General Order No. 3, adopt[s] the [Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine Defendants', Phentermine Defendants' or Health Care Provider Defendants'] Master Answer on file in the coordination court.

OPTIONAL [DEFENDANT[S]] assert[s] the following additional affirmative defenses with respect to the above-captioned action:

DATED:

By 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Attorneys for Defendant[s], [DEFENDANT[S]]