Free Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv-01386-DJS

Document 88

Filed 05/19/2005

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

STATE OF CONNECTICUT ex rel. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, SECRETARY Defendants.

: : : : : CASE NO. 3:00CV1386 (DJS) : : : : : : JUDGMENT

This action having come on for consideration of defendants' motion for summary judgment [dkt.#60] and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [dkt.#64] before the Honorable Dominic J. Squatrito, United States District Judge, and The court having considered the motions and the full record of the case including applicable principles of law, and having filed a Memorandum of Decision stating although Connecticut has satisfied the minimum constitutional threshold for standing, prudential common law rules deny it standing, either in its own right or as parens patriae, to pursue its claim that 16 U.S.C. §1854(f)(1)(A) violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Further, while Connecticut does have standing to bring its claim that §1854(f)(1)(A) violates the Tenth Amendment, the facts show that the statue does not, by its terms, create a constitutional injury. Connecticut's motion for summary judgment [doc.#64] is DENIED. The United State's motion for summary judgment [doc.#60] is GRANTED, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that judgment shall enter in favor of the Defendant on all counts of the Amended Complaint. Dated at Hartford, Connecticut, this 19th day of May 2005.

KEVIN F. ROWE, Clerk By Terri Glynn Deputy Clerk

Case 3:00-cv-01386-DJS

Document 88

Filed 05/19/2005

Page 2 of 2