Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 1 of 18
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS TKC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 08-358C (Chief Judge Damich)
DEFENDANT'S ANSWER For its answer to the complaint, defendant admits, denies, and alleges as follows: 1. Denies the allegations contained in the first
sentence of paragraph 1 for lack of knowledge of information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. The
allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 1 are conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that the United States has executed a contract with the plaintiff. 2. The allegations contained in paragraph 2 are
conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that the United States has executed a contract with the plaintiff.
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 2 of 18
3.
Admits the allegations contained in the first
sentence of paragraph 3 to the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 3. Admits the allegations contained
in the second sentence of paragraph 3. 4. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 4 to
the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 4. 5. The allegations contained in paragraph 5 are
conclusions of law, and plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 6. Admits the allegations contained in the first
sentences of paragraph 6 to the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 6. Admits the allegations contained Admits the
in the second sentence of paragraph 6.
allegations contained in the third and fourth sentences of paragraph 6 to the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies 2
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 3 of 18
the allegations contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph 6. 7. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 7 to
the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 7. 8. Admits the allegations contained in first, second
and third sentences of paragraph 8 to the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first, second and third sentences of paragraph 8. the allegations contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 8. 9. Admits the allegations contained in the first The allegations contained in the Admits
sentence of paragraph 9.
second sentence of paragraph 9 are plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that Exhibit D is an authentic copy of a letter sent to the plaintiff. 10. The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 10 are conclusions of law, and plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is 3
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 4 of 18
required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that plaintiff submitted a claim, dated January 25, 2007, for $13,547,786.30. Denies the allegations contained in the
second sentence of paragraph 10. 11. Admits the allegations contained in the first and The allegations contained
second sentences of paragraph 11.
in the third sentence of paragraph 11 are plaintiff's conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 12. The allegations contained in paragraph 12 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 13. 14. 15. Admits. Admits. The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 15 are plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that both the plaintiff and the National Business Center at the Department of the Interior submitted 4
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 5 of 18
proposals.
The allegations contained in the second sentence
of paragraph 15 are plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that a three-person team evaluated the two proposals. Admits the allegations contained in the third
sentence of paragraph 15. 16. Admits the allegations contained in the first The allegations contained in the
sentence of paragraph 16.
second sentence of paragraph 16 are plaintiff's characterization of this action, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 17. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 17
to the extent supported by the documents cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 17. 18. Admits the allegations contained in the first
sentence of paragraph 18 to the extent supported by the documents cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 18. Admits the allegations
contained in the second sentence of 5
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 6 of 18
paragraph 18. 19. The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 19 are plaintiff's characterization of this action, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Admits the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 19 to the extent supported by the documents cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 19. 20. The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 20 are plaintiff's characterization of this action, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 20. Admits the allegations contained in the third Admits
sentence of paragraph 20 to the extent supported by the document cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the third paragraph of paragraph 20. 21. 22. Denies. The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 22 are conclusions of law, and plaintiff's 6
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 7 of 18
characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies the allegations contained
in the second sentence of paragraph 22 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters asserted. Admits the allegations contained
in the third sentence of paragraph 22 to the extent supported by the document cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the third sentence of paragraph 22. Admits the
allegations contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 22. The allegations contained in the fifth sentence of
paragraph 22 are conclusions of law, and plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 23. The allegations contained in paragraph 23 are
conclusions of law, and plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits the allegations contained in paragraph 23 to the extent supported by the documents cited.
7
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 8 of 18
24.
Denies the allegations contained in the first The allegations contained in the
sentence of paragraph 24.
second, third, fourth and fifth sentences of paragraph 24 are plaintiff's characterization of this action, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 25. Admits the allegations contained in the first Denies the allegations contained The allegations
sentence of paragraph 25.
in the second sentence of paragraph 25.
contained in the third sentence of paragraph 25 are plaintiff's characterization of this action, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 26. The allegations contained in paragraph 26 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 27. The allegations contained in paragraph 27 are
plaintiff's characterization of this action, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that the parties discussed possible hardware substitutions in April 2006. 8
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 9 of 18
28.
The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 28 are plaintiff's characterization of this action, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that there was a meeting between Mr. Burns (the Chief Technology Officer at the time), representatives of the plaintiff, and others, in June 2006. The allegations
contained in the second sentence of paragraph 28 are plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that the possible return of equipment was discussed at one or more meetings in 2006. 29. The allegations contained in the first and second
sentences of paragraph 29 are conclusions of law, and plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits the allegations contained in the first and second sentence of paragraph 29 to the extent supported by the documents cited. Denies the third sentence of paragraph 29. The allegations
contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 29 are plaintiff's characterization of this action, to which no 9
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 10 of 18
response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that plaintiff responded by September 6, 2006 -- the extended response time. 30. The allegations contained in paragraph 30 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 31. The allegations contained in paragraph 31 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 32. The allegations contained in paragraph 32 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 33. The allegations contained in paragraph 33 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 34. The allegations contained in paragraph 34 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that 10
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 11 of 18
they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that the agency continues to use e-mail as part of its routine office procedure. 35. The allegations contained in paragraph 35 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 36. Denies for lack of knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters asserted. 37. Admits the allegations contained in the first Denies the allegations contained Admits
sentence of paragraph 37.
in the second and third sentences of paragraph 37. the allegations contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 37. 38.
Admits the allegations contained in the first Admits the allegations contained
sentence of paragraph 38.
in the second sentence of paragraph 38 to the extent supported by the document cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 38. The allegations
contained in the third and fourth sentences of paragraph 38 are plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of 11
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 12 of 18
this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied, except admits that the agency continues to use e-mail as part of its routine office procedure. 39. The allegations contained in paragraph 39 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 40. The allegations contained in paragraph 40 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 41. The allegations contained in paragraph are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 42. Denies for lack of knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters asserted. 43. The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 43 are plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations 12
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 13 of 18
of fact, they are denied.
Denies the allegations contained
in the second sentence of paragraph 43 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters asserted. 44. Denies for lack of knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters asserted. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies. The allegations contained in paragraph 50 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 51. The allegations contained in paragraph 51 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 52. Denies the first and second sentences of paragraph
52 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters asserted. 13 The
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 14 of 18
allegations contained in the third sentence of paragraph 52 are plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 53. The allegations contained in paragraph 53 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 54. The United States incorporates by reference its
responses to paragraphs 1 through 53 of plaintiff's complaint. 55. The allegations contained in paragraph 55 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 56. The allegations contained in paragraph 56 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 57. The allegations contained in paragraph 57 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this
14
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 15 of 18
action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 58. The United States incorporates by reference its
responses to paragraphs 1 through 53 of plaintiff's complaint. 59. The allegations contained in paragraph 59 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 60. The allegations contained in paragraph 60 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 61. The allegations contained in paragraph 61 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 62. The United States incorporates by reference its
responses to paragraphs 1 through 53 of plaintiff's complaint. 63. The allegations contained in paragraph 63 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this
15
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 16 of 18
action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 64. The allegations contained in paragraph 64 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 65. The allegations contained in paragraph 65 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 66. The allegations contained in paragraph 66 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 67. The allegations contained in paragraph 67 are
plaintiff's conclusions of law and characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 68. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief
set forth in the prayer for relief immediately following paragraph 67, or to any relief whatsoever. 69. Denies each and every allegation not previously
admitted or otherwise qualified. 16
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 17 of 18
WHEREFORE, defendant requests that the Court enter judgment in its favor, order that the complaint be dismissed, and grant defendant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully submitted, GREGORY G. KATSAS Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director S/ Kirk T. Manhardt KIRK T. MANHARDT Assistant Director S/ James W. Poirier JAMES W. POIRIER Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor, 1100 L St, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: 202-616-0856 Fax: 202-514-7969 September 15, 2008 Attorneys for Defendant
17
Case 1:08-cv-00358-EJD
Document 13
Filed 09/15/2008
Page 18 of 18
CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on September 15, 2008, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S ANSWER" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. system. S/ James W. Poirier Parties may access this filing through the Court's