Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 32.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: June 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 460 Words, 2,804 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/22982/9.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims ( 32.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:08-cv-00081-CFL

Document 9

Filed 06/04/2008

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS AEROPLATE CORP. Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 08-81C (Judge Lettow)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Pursuant to Rule 6(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims, defendant, the United States, respectfully requests a 31-day enlargement of time, to and including July 7, 2008, within which to file its response to the amended complaint. Our response is currently due on June 6, 2008. This is defendant's second request for an enlargement of time. We previously obtained one 45-day enlargement. Plaintiff's counsel has authorized us to state that plaintiff does not oppose this motion. The enlargement is requested because defendant's trial counsel has not yet received a litigation report from the interested agency, the Bureau of the National Guard. As we explained in our first motion for an enlargement, the Department of Justice promptly sent a copy of the original complaint and a request for a litigation report to the Department of the Army. However, due to the unusual structure of the Bureau of the National Guard (a joint bureau of the Department of the Army and the Department of the Air Force), there was a delay in identifying the legal office that will act as agency counsel in this case. We have discussed the complaint with agency counsel and have requested that the preparation of the litigation report be expedited. At this time, however, trial counsel does not have the information necessary to draft a response to the amended complaint.

Case 1:08-cv-00081-CFL

Document 9

Filed 06/04/2008

Page 2 of 3

For the foregoing reasons, defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant this motion for an enlargement of time of 31 days, to an including July 7, 2008, within which to file a response to the amended complaint. Respectfully submitted, GREGORY G. KATSAS Acting Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director s/ Kirk T. Manhardt KIRK T. MANHARDT Assistant Director s/ Roger A. Hipp ROGER A. HIPP Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 305-3091 Fax: (202) 514-8640 June 4, 2008 Attorneys for Respondent

Case 1:08-cv-00081-CFL

Document 9

Filed 06/04/2008

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on the 4th day of June, 2008, a copy of the foregoing "UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/ Roger A. Hipp