Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :05-cv-00072-JJF Document 61 Filed 05/31 /2006 Page 1 of 2
Asn-1EY 8. GEDDES
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW TELEPHONE
222 DELAWARE AVENUE °°2`°°""°°°
P. o. Box uso aogizimgssv
wu.M|NGTON. DELAWARE I9899
May 31, 2006
VIA E—FILE AND HAND DELIVERY
Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
United States District Court
District of Delaware
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
844 N. King Street
Room 4124, Lockbox 27
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
• Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Royal, Case N0. 02-1294-JJF;
• Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee of Student Finance Corp. v.
Pepper Hamilton, et al., Case No. 04-1551-JJF;
• Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee of Student Finance Corp. v.
McGladrey & Pullen LLP, et al., Case No. 05-72—.IJF; and
• Ro al v. Pe er Hamilton, et al., Case No 05-165-JJF
Dear Judge Farnan:
Pursuant to the Court’s Order of May 18, 2006 and Your Honor’s comments from the
bench at the hearing which occurred the day before, counsel for all parties have met and
conferred several times in an attempt to reach consensus regarding case management schedules
and a coordinated discovery plan for the four above—referenced cases. This joint letter of counsel
identifies the basic areas of disagreement that remain:
1. The parties do not fully agree regarding the extent to which document production
has been completed and how that should affect the commencement of depositions.
2. The parties do not fully agree as to when depositions should begin.
3. The parties do not fully agree regarding the extent to which the seven hour
deposition limit contained in the Federal Rules should be relaxed in order to
facilitate coordinated depositions.
4. The parties do not fully agree regarding an appropriate date range for trial.

Case 1:05-cv-00072-JJF

Document 61

Filed 05/31/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00072-JJF

Document 61

Filed 05/31/2006

Page 2 of 2