Free Order - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 38.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 1, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 330 Words, 2,138 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21603/47.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Federal Claims ( 38.8 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00668-FMA

Document 47

Filed 12/01/2006

Page 1 of 2

In The United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 06- 668C (Filed: December 1, 2006) __________ REILLY'S WHOLESALE PRODUCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, And FOUR SEASONS PRODUCE, INC., Defendant-Intervenor.

_________ ORDER __________

On September 19, 2006, plaintiff filed a bid protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) contesting the award of an interim contract by the Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA) to defendant-intervenor for the provision of fresh fruits and vegetables. Following DeCA's decision to override the automatic stay as to this interim contract, on September 25, 2006, plaintiff filed a complaint in this court seeking a declaratory judgment, a temporary restraining order, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to set aside the override decision. On October 13, 2006, the court issued an order, with an effective date of October 20, 2006, preliminarily enjoining the performance of the interim contract. On October 18, 2006, DeCA issued a notice of termination of the interim contract for the convenience of the government, which termination became effective on October 20, 2006. On October 19, 2006, the GAO dismissed plaintiff's protest of the interim contract owing to the termination of that contract. On October 27, 2006, defendant moved to dismiss this case as moot. On November 27, 2006, plaintiff objected to defendant's motion, seeking various attorney's fees, expert witness expenses, and costs.

Case 1:06-cv-00668-FMA

Document 47

Filed 12/01/2006

Page 2 of 2

As the interim contract has been terminated, this case is moot. The complaint is hereby DISMISSED. Costs, as allowable under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, shall be taxed against defendant and awarded to plaintiff. However, plaintiff has not provided an appropriate application for the other items it seeks, see, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), and, accordingly, its request in this regard is otherwise DENIED. The Clerk shall enter an appropriate order or decree. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Francis M. Allegra Francis M. Allegra Judge

-2-