Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 75.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: October 4, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 478 Words, 2,891 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/9365/269.pdf

Download Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware ( 75.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :05-cv-00048-SLR Document 269 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
HITACHI, LTD. and HITACHI AUTOMOTIVE )
PRODUCTS (USA), INC., )
)
i Plaintiffs, )
· )
v. )
) Civil Action No. 05-048-SLR
BORGWARNER INC. )
and BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC., )
) .
Defendants. )

)
BORGWARNER INC., )
)
Counterclaimant, )
)
v. )
)
HITACHI, LTD. and HITACHI AUTOMOTIVE )
PRODUCTS (USA), INC., )
)
Counterdefendants. )
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT
THE BUTTERFIELD PAPER SUBMITTED TO IMECHE
DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PRIOR ART UNDER 35 U.S.C. §§ l02(a) OR 102(b)
Defendants BorgWamer, Inc. and BorgWamer Morse Tec Inc., (collectively
"BorgWamer"), submit this motion for an Order granting summary judgment that the Butterfield
Paper Submitted to IMECHE Does Not Constitute Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C.
§§ l02(a) or l02(b).

Case 1:05-cv-00048-SLR Document 269 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 2 of 3
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying BorgWarner’s Memorandum In
Support of Motion For Summary Judgment That the Butterfield Paper Submitted to IMechE
Does Not Constitute Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C §§ l02(a) or l02(b), BorgWamer respectfully
requests that the motion be granted.
/
( _
Dated: October 4, 2006
R`ch rd K. H ann (I.D. #405)
Mary B. Ma erer (I.D. #2696)
222 Delaw re Ave., 10th Floor
Wilmin n, Delaware 19801
(302) 88 -6800
Hugh A. Abrams (pro hac vice)
Thomas D. Rein (pro hoc vice)
Lisa A. Sclmeider (pro hoc vice)
Marc A. Cavan (pro hoc vice)
Lara (Fleishman) Hirshfeld (pro hac vice)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearbom Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
(312) 853-7000

Case 1:05-cv-00048-SLR Document 269 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on October 4, 2006, I caused the following document,
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT THE BUTTERFIELD PAPER
SUBMITTED TO IMECHE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PRIOR ART UNDER 35 U.S.C.
§§ 102(a) OR 102(b) to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which
will send notification of such filing to the following:
Steven J. Balick, Esq.
John G. Day, Esq.
Tiffany Geyer Lydon, Esq.
ASHBY & GEDDES
222 Delaware Avenue, 17th Floor
Wilmington, DE 19801
Additionally, I hereby certify that on October 4, 2006, I caused the foregoing
document to be served via email and by overnight courier on the following non-registered
participants:
Michael D. Kaminski, Esq.
Pavan K. Agarwal, Esq.
Liane M. Peterson
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20007-5109
mkaminski@,fo1ey.com
[email protected]
[email protected] ( .//· V
MARY B. M TTERER (I.D. #2696)
MORRIS, J MES, HITCHENS & WILLLAMS LLP
222 Delaw re Avenue, 10th Floor
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
(302) 888-6800
mmatterer(Q),mo1*1·is]`ames.com
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimant,
BORGWARNER INC., and
BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC.