Free Reply Brief - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 17.1 kB
Pages: 4
Date: November 22, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 661 Words, 4,127 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/9364/29.pdf

Download Reply Brief - District Court of Delaware ( 17.1 kB)


Preview Reply Brief - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv-00047-GMS

Document 29

Filed 11/22/2005

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BRIAN K. REINBOLD, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS BRANCH 1977, Defendant. BRIAN K. REINBOLD, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, and NALC LOCAL 191, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Civil Action No. 04-342-GMS

Civil Action No. 05-47-GMS

REPLY OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants Motion To Dismiss ("Plaintiff's Answer") (D.I.-26) fails to respond to the arguments raised in the Motion of United States Postal Service To Dismiss Or In The Alternative To Compel Rule 26(a) Disclosures by Plaintiff ("USPS' Motion") (D.I.-24). Plaintiff's Answer disputes the factual basis asserted by the National Association of Letter Carrier Branch 191 and Branch 1977 ("Union Defendants") in their Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution, or in the Alternative to Compel Discovery ("Motion to Dismiss") (D.I.-22). His succinct Answer shows what purports to be proof of service of his discovery responses on the Union Defendants.

Case 1:05-cv-00047-GMS

Document 29

Filed 11/22/2005

Page 2 of 4

However, Plaintiff apparently does not dispute, as asserted in the USPS' Motion and Memorandum in support thereof (D.I.-24 & D.I.-25), that he failed to serve Rule 26(a)(1) discovery on any of the three defendants, nor does he dispute the fact that he failed to serve his alleged responses to the Union Defendants' discovery on the USPS. Thus, Plaintiff remains substantially noncompliant with his discovery obligations. Nonetheless, subject of course to Court approval, the USPS is agreeable to staying consideration of its Motion (D.I.-24) if the Court extends the discovery deadline, as requested in the USPS Motion and in the defendants' Joint Motion to Extend Discovery and to Extend the Summary Judgment Deadline. D.I.-28. In that event, the USPS requests that the due date for summary judgment motions be extended until thirty days after the rescheduled close of discovery. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.5, attached is a certification that the undersigned has sent to the USPS a copy of this request to extend the deadline for concluding discovery and for filing summary judgment motions, and that the USPS is in agreement. Respectfully submitted, COLM F. CONNOLLY United States Attorney By: /s/Patricia C. Hannigan Patricia C. Hannigan Assistant United States Attorney Delaware Bar I.D. No. 2145 The Nemours Building 1007 Orange Street, Suite 700 P. O. Box 2046 Wilmington, DE 19899-2046 (302) 573-6277 [email protected]

Dated: November 22, 2005

2

Case 1:05-cv-00047-GMS

Document 29

Filed 11/22/2005

Page 3 of 4

CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that she has sent a copy of this request for an extension of the deadline for completion of discovery to the United States Postal Service.

By:

/s/Patricia C. Hannigan Patricia C. Hannigan Assistant United States Attorney

Case 1:05-cv-00047-GMS

Document 29

Filed 11/22/2005

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 22, 2005, I electronically filed a REPLY OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. Notification of such filing will be electronically mailed to the following: Susan E. Kaufman, Esquire Heiman, Gouge & Kaufman, LLP P.O. Box 1674 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 658-1800 [email protected] and two copies of the foregoing REPLY OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, will be mailed, via First Class U.S. Mail to the following: Brian K. Reinbold 3909 Delaware Street Wilmington, DE 19808 Pro Se COLM F. CONNOLLY United States Attorney By: /s/Patricia C. Hannigan Patricia C. Hannigan Assistant United States Attorney Delaware Bar I.D. No. 2145 The Nemours Building 1007 Orange Street, Suite 700 P. O. Box 2046 Wilmington, DE 19899-2046 (302) 573-6277 [email protected]