Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 30.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: May 29, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 491 Words, 3,118 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21033/19.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims ( 30.6 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00124-MCW

Document 19

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

____________________________________ ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF ) AMERICA ) ) Defendant ) ____________________________________) ROBERT WILLIAMS and LAVERNE WILLIAMS

No. 06-124C (Judge Williams)

MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT: NOW COMES, Robert & Laverne Williams, by and through counsel and files this their MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS and would show the court the following: 1. 2. Plaintiffs response was due on May 28, 2007, which was a federal holiday. Counsel for Plaintiff was preparing in and was engaged in a civil jury trial,

Case Name: Martin v. San Antonio Police, et al, Case Number: 5:05-cv-20, Western District of Texas, USDC, Judge Xavier Rodriguez, Presiding, For the entire week of May 21, 2007 until May 25, 2007. Due to counsels due diligence in Martin v.SAPD, and the Memorial Holiday, counsel was unable to adequately compile a response.

1

Case 1:06-cv-00124-MCW

Document 19

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 2 of 3

3.

Additionally, counsel will be out of the city the entire week from May 29-

June 2, 2007 in order to take depositions and attend to other discovery issues in Williams v. Johanns, Case No.03-cv-2245 CKK JMF, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. 4. Counsel has not conferred with opposing counsel Mr. Kirk Manhardt on

this matter and, therefore, he does not know his position on this motion. 5. This request is not made for delay, but in the interest of justice.

Wherefore, premise considered, counsel prays the court grant this motion for enlargement of time to respond to DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS and set the time to respond to June 15, 2007. Respectfully submitted, James W. Myart, Jr. P.C. 1104 Denver Blvd San Antonio, Texas 78210 Phone: (210) 533-9461 Fax: (210) 533-4815 By:__/s/____________________ James W. Myart, Jr. FBN: TX0021 [email protected] ATTY FOR PLAINTIFF CERTIFCATE OF SERVICE A copy of the foregoing has been served this 29th day of May, 2007 on Mr. Kirk Manhardt, Counsel for Defendants via ECF and FAX .

/s/_____________________ James W. Myart, Jr.

2

Case 1:06-cv-00124-MCW

Document 19

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 3 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

____________________________________ ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF ) AMERICA ) ) Defendant ) ____________________________________) ROBERT WILLIAMS and LAVERNE WILLIAMS ORDER On this day came to be heard Plaintiff's MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. It is found that Plaintiff's motion is meritorious, therefore, the motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's responses are now due on June 15, 2007.

No. 06-124C (Judge Williams)

DATE

JUDGE PRESIDING

3