Free Motion to Amend Schedule - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 28.6 kB
Pages: 4
Date: April 27, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 451 Words, 2,807 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21030/35.pdf

Download Motion to Amend Schedule - District Court of Federal Claims ( 28.6 kB)


Preview Motion to Amend Schedule - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00122-FMA

Document 35

Filed 04/27/2006

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS NVT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 06-122C (Judge Allegra)

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Pursuant to RCFC 16(b), defendant, the United States, respectfully requests the Court to convene a scheduling conference, by telephone, to discuss the schedule for oral argument concerning the cross motions for judgment upon the administrative record. Counsel for the United States suggested

to counsel for plaintiff, NVT Technologies, Inc. ("NVT"), that such a telephone call could be made jointly to chambers. However, counsel for NVT has indicated that he will only participate in such a conversation pursuant to a court order. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Court issue an order convening a scheduling conference by telephone. Counsel for the United States has a two-year old son. His

son must undergo medical treatment on May 18, 2006 -- the same day that oral argument is scheduled to be held. Thus, counsel

for the United States will be unable to attend oral argument on May 18, 2006.

Case 1:06-cv-00122-FMA

Document 35

Filed 04/27/2006

Page 2 of 4

Counsel for the United States is available on many other days. We respectfully suggest that oral argument be held on some

different date convenient to the Court and to counsel for NVT. In the event that the date for oral argument cannot be changed, counsel for the United States will make arrangements to transfer the argument to another attorney at the Department of Justice. However, in order to promptly make such arrangements,

counsel must know whether May 18, 2006 is the only possible day for oral argument. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the

scheduling conference be convened in the near future. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director /S Donald E. Kinner DONALD E. KINNER Assistant Director

-2-

Case 1:06-cv-00122-FMA

Document 35

Filed 04/27/2006

Page 3 of 4

/S James W. Poirier JAMES W. POIRIER Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor, 1100 L St, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: 202-307-6289 Fax: 202-514-7969 April 27, 2006` Attorneys for Defendant

-3-

Case 1:06-cv-00122-FMA

Document 35

Filed 04/27/2006

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on April 27, 2006, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing

will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. the Court's system. S/ James W. Poirier Parties may access this filing through

-4-