Free Stipulation of Dismissal - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00027-SLR

Document 272

Filed 08/24/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) DELL, INC.; GATEWAY, INC.; ) HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY; ) ACER INC.; ACER AMERICA CORPORATION; ) COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.; ) MAG TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD.; ) MAG TECHNOLOGY USA, INC.; ) PROVIEW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD.; ) PROVIEW TECHNOLOGY, INC.; and ) PROVIEW ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD., ) ) Defendants. ________________________________________________________ ) STIPULATED DISMISSAL WHEREAS, plaintiff, Guardian Industries Corp., alleged that defendants MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG Technology USA, Inc. have infringed United States Patents Nos. 5,570,214, 5,694,187, 6,226,065 and 6,229,588; WHEREAS, MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG Technology USA, Inc. have provided a Written Confirmation that they do not have unlicensed LCD module suppliers; WHEREAS, MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG Technology USA, Inc. have provided a Written Confirmation that they do not sell any LCD products that incorporate unlicensed LCD modules containing Fuji Wide View Film; and WHEREAS, plaintiff Guardian Industries Corp. and defendants MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG Technology USA, Inc., as indicated by the signature of counsel appearing below, have agreed to the dismissal of MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG

C.A. No.: 05-27-SLR Jury Trial Demanded

Case 1:05-cv-00027-SLR

Document 272

Filed 08/24/2007

Page 2 of 2

Technology USA, Inc. from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and subject to the terms of this Order, NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: 1. In view of the representations made by MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG Technology USA, Inc. in the Written Confirmation, the claims by Guardian Industries Corp. against MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG Technology USA, Inc. are hereby dismissed without prejudice with respect to MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG Technology USA, Inc. 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees attributable to the prosecution and defense of this action against MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG Technology USA, Inc. STIPULATED AND AGREED /s/ Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann #405 MORRIS JAMES LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 888-6800 [email protected] Bryan S. Hales Craig D. Leavell Meredith Zinanni Eric Hayes KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312) 861-2000 Counsel for Guardian Industries Corp. /s/ Richard L. Horwitz Richard L. Horwitz #2246 POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 984-6000 [email protected] William E. Potts, Jr. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-1564 (202) 887-4000 Counsel for MAG Technology Company, Ltd. and MAG Technology USA, Inc.

SO ORDERED this ______ day of ______________________, 2007.

Judge Sue L. Robinson -2-