Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :05-cv-00023-JJF Document 88 Filed O2/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
Potter
¤ Anderson _
A CON-OOD LLP §Vm¥§;?rd1ng Drane, Jr.
Attomey at Law
;g;}§,ljgg,Ma*‘<·** **8* §”1?§a‘§§€‘?23‘f§”‘15`SZ2i°1?1Z?.’2
Wilmington, DE 19899-0951 302 7788019 Fax
802 984 8000
.......,...........1.... ......,.,. .. Fcbmfy 0 2007
BY E-FILE AND BY HAND
The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
United States District Court
844 North King Street
Lock Box 27
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Dow Chemical Canada, Inc. v. HRD Corporation, C.A. No. 05-23 (UF)
Dear Judge Farnan:
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.4, HRD respectfully concurs with Dow's request that the
Court entertain oral argument on Dow's motions for protective order. (D.1. 72 and D.I. 77). As
previously set forth in my letter to the Court dated December 29, 2006 (D.I. 80), HRD
respectfully suggests that the Court schedule argument on HRD's motion to compel (D.I. 71) and
on Dow's motions for protective order for the same time, a suggestion that Dow now has
endorsed (D.I. 87).
Respectfully,
an . 888%% 1
W. Harding Drane, .
Delaware Bar I.D. #1023
WHD:rb
cc: Kenneth Nachbar, Esquire (by e-mail)
Aaron Barlow, Esquire (by e-mail)
Samuel T. Hirzel (by e-mail)
William C. Ferebee, Esquire (by e-mail)
Michael Landrum, Esquire (by-email)
#776779/28882