Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 119.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 6, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 482 Words, 2,983 Characters
Page Size: 614.4 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/9339/51-1.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 119.9 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv—OOO22-IVIPT Document 51 Filed O9/06/2005 Page 1 of 2


ymcem A, Biffgmm Jp Alternative Dispute Resolution
lan Connor Bilterato —
.lel1teyl\’l. tiemiimti Vincent A. Biileraln
Joseph 1<. inrien. 111 Willienn Swnin Lev
George T. rms, 111 Carl Sclinee
temnica 0. Faust ——
1)axidW.deBruin* Sgptcuqbgy 6)
David t\. Denham \\’1—im-*5 [img] _-\L1t11—Ct\;
tzamerme xwoiak lxilian ils1>d¢-win
Joseph K- Koury Reply to; Wilniington
(Earvan R l\1cDa11ie1
*t\dmitted in HA 8; M only
BY E-FILE
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
United States District Court for the
District of Delaware
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
844 N. King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Si. Paul Mercury rl/Iereury Insurczrzce Company cmd Puck and Process, Inc. v. Muly Yam
Civil Action N0. 05-022
Dear Judge Jordan:
This firm, along with the law firm of Deasey, Mahoney & Bender, Ltd., is counsel to the plaintiffs
in the above—referenced proceeding, who are also the defendants in a proceeding pending in this Court
before Chief Judge Robinson as Civil Action No. 05-513. The action pending before Chief Judge
Robinson has been transferred to the Court from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
Enclosed herewith is a Stipu/cz1ion_/or C'om*olida!ion executed by various counsel for all parties to
this action. The parties respectfully request that the enclosed stipulation be entered as an Order ofthe
Court, the effect of which will be to consolidate Civil Action No. 05-513 with this proceeding for purposes
of discovery, case management, and trial. As we understand the current posture, once the enclosed
stipulation and a similar stipulation simultaneously being filed in the other action are entered, both actions
will be administered under a single caption before Your Honor and a scheduling order will be entered
consistent with the recently—held Rule 16 teleconference. Thus the parties’ request that the Court enter the
enclosed document, with a consolidated-caption scheduling order to be sent following entry ofthe order of
consolidation.
Bifferalo, Gentilotti & Blden, PA.
www.bgbr1e.rom »
I308 INIQP Aienue
200 Bitltlle ·\\enue Wilrliington. DE 19806 701 Rehoboth Axenue
Suite 203 R0 Box 2165 Rehoboth Bearh. DE 19971
Newark. DE 19702 \\`ilmin;;ton. DE 19899 - 2165 Phone: 302 - 227- 6600
Phone: 302 - 429 - 1900 Phone; 302 - -129 ~ 1900 Toll Free; 866 - 618 - 2-133
Fax; 302 - 832 - 7540 Fax; 302 - 429 - 8600 Fax; 302 - 227- 6778

Case 1 :05-cv—OOO22-IVIPT Document 51 Filed O9/06/2005 Page 2 of 2
Bifferato, Gentilotti & Biden, P.A.
The Honorable Kent A. Iordan
September 6, 2005
Page Two
We are available at the Court’s convenience to discuss this matter should it have any
questions or concerns. Thank you.
Respectfully,
lg- (
oseph K. Koury (#4272
Enclosure
cc: James B. Burns, Esq. (by fax)
Yvonne Takvorian Saville, Esq. (by fax)