Free Verdict Sheet - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Z Case 1 :05-cv—OOO22-M PT Document 160 Filed O4/08/2008 Page 1 of 3 C
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
- FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE :
COMPANY and PACK AND :
PROCESS, INC. : Case N0. 05—0022 (MPT)
g MALY YAN E c _ )
=l==l<=l<=i<=i=>k=i==|==i==[==}=>1<=k=i==l=>l==k=1=>k=I¢>l==l==1==l==i==|<=1==k>l<=k=|=>k=i<=k=l==k '
` c YAN THOU, et al. :
Z v. Case N0. 05-00513 (MPT)
PACK & PROCESS, INC., et al. I CONSOLIDATED CASES
Plaintiffs’ Proposed Special Interregaterics Te The J ug;
1) Did Maly Yan ewn the 1992 Dedge Ram van that was invelved inthe June 18,
2
2001 meter vehicle accident.
2) Was Maly Yan living with her father en June 18, 2001.
3) Was Maly Yan acting Within the scepc ef her empleymcnt with Pack & Precess
when she was driving the Dedge Ram van that was involved in the June 18, 2001 meter
1 vehicle accident.

Case 1 :05-cv—OOO22-M PT Document 160 Filed O4/08/2008 Page 2 of 3 I _
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE :
COMPANY and PACK AND :
PROCESS, INC. : Case N0. 05—0O22 (MPT)
Marr YAN S
YAN TI-IOU, etal. I A
I v. Case N0. 05-00513 (MPT)
PACK & PROCESS, INC., et al. CONSOLIDATED CASES
DEFENDANTS PROPOSED VERDICT SHEET
1. Ou June 18, 2001, was Maly Yan an agent/employee of Pack & Process?
ANSWER: YES NO
2. On June 18, 2001, was Maly Yan acting in the course and scope of her
employment with Pack & Process while transporting employees to and from the
Pack and Process factory? -
ANSVVER: YES NO
3. On June 18, 2001, was Maly Yan performing a duty related to the conduct of
ff; Pack & Process’ business while transporting employees to and from the Pack &
Process factory?
ANSWER: YES NO
4. Did Yan’s duties at Pack & Process include transporting workers to and from the
Pack & Process facility?

Case 1 :05-cv—OOO22-MPT Document 160 Filed O4/08/2008 Page 3 of 3
ANSWER: YES NO
5. Did Lam Staffing, Inc. and/or Pack & Process pay Maly Yan to transport workers
· to and from Pack & Process?
ANSWER: YES NO
6. Was the 1992 Dodge Ram van, bearing Pennsylvania license plate No. DZK8292,
owned by Maly Yan or a member of her household at the time ofthe accident?
Zi ANSWER: YES NO
7. Was Maly Yan authorized, actually or by implication, by Pack & Process to drive
the workers to and from the plant?
ANSWER: YES NO
8. Did Pack & Process’ business actuate, i.e. motivate or put into motion, Maly Yan-
to any appreciable extent when she transported employees to and from the Pack &
Process factory?
ANSWER: YES NO
9. Were either the exchange between Maly Yan and Adkins or the conversations
between Maly Yan and Newsome actual or implied authorization for her to
it transport workers? ‘
ANSWER: YES NO
10. Under the totality of the circumstances, was Maly Yan acting with actual or
implied authority from Pack & Process when she transported employees to and
from the Pack & Process factory? -
ANSWER: YES m______ NO _“_“