Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv—00022-l\/IPT Document 136-2 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
............-.--.--.-~..-.---- X
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE C.A. No.: 05-0022-MPT
COMPANY and PACK & :
PROCESS, INC. :
piamtirf, 2
V.
MALY YAN,
Defendant.
...-----....-.-.-------------- X
YAN THOU, et al., C.A. N0.: 05-0513-MPT
Plaintiffs,
: CONSOLIDATED CASES
V. I
PACK & PROCESS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
--.-.--...---.-...-------.--.- X
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING ORDER
At Wilmington, the day of , 2007, the Court having conducted a
teleconference with all parties for the purpose of supplementing the September 16, 2005
Scheduling Order for the above captioned matter,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Discovery has been completed. Defendant l\Aaly Yan seeks to take one
additional Rule 30(b)(6) depositions. Plaintiff reserves the right to object to the deposition

Case 1:05-cv—00022-MPT Document 136-2 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 2 of 3
once Plaintiff is provided with the subject matters of the desired Rule 30(b)(6) depositions.
2. Pretrlal Conference. On , 2008, the Court will hold a Final Pretrlal
Conference in Chambers with counsel beginning at _.m. Unless otherwise ordered by the
Court, the parties should assume that filing the pretrial order satisfies the pretrial
disclosure requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). The parties shall file
with the Court the joint proposed final pretrial order with the information required by the
form of Final Pretrlal Order which accompanies this Scheduling Order on or before
, 2008.
3. Motions in Lim/ne. Motions in limine shall not be separately filed. All in limine
requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each
party shall be limited to five in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court.
The in limine request and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in
limine request may be supported by a maximum of three pages of argument and may be
opposed by a maximum of three pages of argument. If more than one party is supporting or
opposing an in /im/ne request, such support or opposition shall be combined in a single
three (3) page submission, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. No separate briefing
shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court.
4. Jug; instructions, Voir Dire, and Special Verdict Forms. Where a case is to be
tried to a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47 and 51 the parties should Hle proposed voir dire,
instructions to the jury, and special verdict forms and jury interrogatories three full
business days before the final pretrial conference. That submission shall be accompanied
by a computer diskette (in WordPerfect format) which contains the instructions, proposed

Case 1:05-cv—00022-l\/IPT Document 136-2 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 3 of 3
voir dire, special verdict forms, and jury interrogatories.
5. Trial. This matter is scheduled forafive dayjurytrial beginning at 9:30 a.m.
on , 2008 with the remaining trial days beginning at 9:00 a.m. For the
purpose of completing pretrial preparations, counsel should plan on each side being
allocated a total of eleven (11) hours to present their case.
UNITED STATES l\/IAGISTRATE JUDGE