Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 36.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 14, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 435 Words, 2,843 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/9339/121-1.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Delaware ( 36.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv-00022-MPT

Document 121

Filed 09/14/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE : COMPANY, and : PACK & PROCESS, INC. : Plaintiffs : vs. : Civil Action No. 05-0022 (KAJ) MALY YAN : Defendant : _____________________________________________________________________________ YAN THOU, Individually and as : Administrator of the Estates of Oeurn : Mam, Deceased and Navy Yan, Deceased : Civil Action No. 05-0513 (KAJ) et al. : Plaintiffs : vs. : PACK & PROCESS, INC. AND : ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE : COMPANY : Defendants :

DEFENDANTS' PETITION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE SUR REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants, Yan Thou, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Oeurn Mam, deceased, and Navy Yan, deceased, Chan Yan, Thuha Son, Chieu Thi Huynh, Maly Yan and Bay Thi Nguyen by and through his attorneys, Kline and Specter P.C., hereby submit Defendants' Petition for Leave of Court to File Sur Reply to the Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment, and avers as follows: 1. On August 7, 2006, Plaintiffs moved for Summary Judgment (D.I. 106). 2. On August 28, 2006, Defendants filed their Response in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I. 111). 3. On September 7, 2006, Plaintiffs filed a Reply Brief in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I. 117).

Case 1:05-cv-00022-MPT

Document 121

Filed 09/14/2006

Page 2 of 2

4. Plaintiffs' Reply Brief presents a contradictory argument that has not been previously asserted and requires clarification. 5. The aforementioned arguments contained in Plaintiffs' Reply Brief necessitates a Sur Reply in order to ensure this Court has all relevant information to properly decide the issues presented in Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. 6. Defendants' respectfully request the Court's approval to file the attached Sur Reply in accordance with District of Delaware Local Rule 7.1.2 (c) which states in pertinent part, "No additional briefs, affidavits, or other papers in support of or in opposition to the motions shall be filed without prior approval of the Court." See District of Delaware Local Rule 7.1.2 (c). WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that this Honorable Court approve Defendants' Petition for Leave of Court to File Sur Reply to Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment.
Respectfully submitted, Weiss & Saville, P. A. BY: S/Yvonne Takvorian Saville Yvonne Takvorian Saville, Esquire 1220 North Market Street, Suite 604 P.O. Box 370 Wilmington DE 19801 (302) 656-0400 DATED: 9/14/06 and Kline & Specter, P.C. BY: S/ Joshua Van Naarden Jonathan Cohen, Esquire Joshua Van Naarden, Esquire 1525 Locust Street, 19th Floor Philadelphia PA 19102 215-772-1000

2