tter
Anderson
COITOOI]. LLP David E. Moore
Attorney at Law
_ _ cimoore@potter·anderson com
131.3 N0r‘ll\l\‘lL1rl4ct$JU*irt:t 302 gg4_6;4*'7 Dircct phcnc
itoissxasi 302 658-1192 Fax
Mlrningion, DE l98Q9-0951
im 98% 6000 February 17, 2006
\V\\'\\Z [Nlli€}1“[II1(.I[ZI’§iil]T]r.l!¢)lll
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
844 King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Re: Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc. v.
Interdigital Communications and Interdigital Technology Corporation
C. A. No. 05-16 jJ.}'F) M
Dear Judge Farnan:
We have reviewed Nol
we will reserve our comments in response to Nokia’s position until the scheduling
conference (or telecont`erence)_iointly requested by the parties in the proposed scheduling
order and Mr. BIumenfeld's transmittal letter. Needless to say, we disagree with many of
the characterizations in Nokia's response, but we will save those cornrnents until the
conference with Your Honor.
Res - ,__ ctiully,
Da d E. Moore I. iirillii A CI'' I `
7203tS
DEB/Ifjam
cc: Jack B. Blumenfeld (via etiling and email)
Peter Kontio (via email)
Robert S. Harrell (via email)