Free Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Prosecution - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv—00015-SLR Document 42 Filed 06/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
STEPHANIE F. HAYGOOD, )
Plaintiff, ;
v. g Civ. No. 05-0l5—SLR
BARRY CONNORS, LINDA HARE g
TUCKER, KEN KOON, and SHEILA )
FERRARO, )
Defendants. g
O R D E R
At Wilmington this glgi-day of June, 2006, having
issued an order on June 6, 2006 setting an in—person hearing for
today (D.I. 40); and having received plaintiff’s letter request
for an extension of time without ever following up with the court
to learn if her excuse was acceptable to the court (D.I. 4l); and
having considered the six factors established to determine
whether to dismiss a caseH
IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss for
lack of prosecution (D.I. 29) is granted with prejudice as
plaintiff has failed to participate in meaningful discovery with
the defendants in the eighteen months her case has been on this
court’s docket and has failed to comply with multiple court
orders issued in this litigation.

lgee Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863,
868 (3d Cir. l984).