Free Response - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 1,649.9 kB
Pages: 36
Date: May 29, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 6,396 Words, 40,009 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/18640/42-2.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Federal Claims ( 1,649.9 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 1 of 36

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS NET RESULTS, INC., Plaintiff,
V.

THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 04-1376 C Judge Lawrence M. Baskir

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FOURTH SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS TO DEFENDANT In accordance with Rule 34 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), defendant, the United States, hereby responds to Plaintiff's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things to Defendant, served December 29, 2006.

Comments Defendant reserves the right to amend.or supplement its responses. pursuant to RCFC 26(e). In certain instances herein, defendant offersto produce certain documents. This offer to produce documents is not an admission that such documents are admissible at a hearing or trial in this action, e.g., as

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 2 of 36

coming within an exception to the rule against hearsay. Nor is such an offer to produce documents an admission that responsive and/or non-objectionable documents exist for a given discovery request. Nor is such an offer to produce documents a waiver of defendant'.s right to exclude from discovery such documents based on the following privileges, exemptions, and restrictions: (1) the attorney-client privilege; (2) the attorney work product exemption; (3) the community of interest privilege; (4) the deliberative process privilege; (5) the state secrets privilege; (6) the "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" (FOUO) restriction; (7) the export control restriction; (8) the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, or documents containing proprietary or other commercial information provided to defendant on a pledge of secrecy and confidentiality; and (9) the restrictions of Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

-2-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 3 of 36

With respect to offers to produce documents which contain information proprietary to defendant or a third party, or information subject to the "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" or export control restrictions, such documents will be producedpursuant to a suitable protective order which is stipulated to by.the parties and is entered by the courtl

General Objections Defendant hereby makes the following General Objections to plaintiff's requests for the production of documents and things: 1. Defendant o.bjects to these discovery requests to tlhe extent that they seek documents covered bythe attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, or work product exemption. 2. Defendant objects to these discovery requests to the extent that they seek production of documents prepared by attorneys representing defendant after this action was commenced. Most, if not all, of such documents are subject to the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product exemption, or other privileges. To produce these documents would tend to reveal counsel's mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories. RCFC 26(b)(2). -3-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 4 of 36

3. Defendant objects to these discovery requests .to the extent that they are overly broad, unduly burdensome, unlimited in time, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 4. Defendant objects to these discovery requests to the extent that they are vague and/or ambiguous. 5. Defendant objects to these discovery requests to the extent they seek the production of documents and things created after the date of filing of this lawsuit, August 24, 2004. 6. Defendant objects to these discovery requests to the extent they seek the production of documents and things that are not in the possession, custody, or control of defendant. 7. Defendant objects to plaintiff's numbering of discovery requests to the extent that they are not numbered consecutively.. For example, plaintiff has begun this fourth set of requests with number 1 as the first request even though plaintiff has three times previously issued a request number 1 (on June 15, 2005, as part of its first set of requests; on April 28, 2006, as .part of its second set of requests; and on September 29, 2006, as part of its third set of requests). Such duplication of request numbers creates confusion and ambiguity. -4-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 5 of 36

REQUEST NO. 1 [sic, 35]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the Government's purchase of the AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detection device. Your response should include solicitation(s), requests for proposal(s) and request for quote(s) for purchase, contract(s), purchase order(s), voucher(s), DD Form 250(s), delivery order(s) and task order(s) regarding these purchases hand-held mine detection devices.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the Government's purchase of the AN/PSS-14 hand-held mine detection device" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Defendant also objects to this request to the extent it is duplicative of plaintiff's Request No. 28. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant has already produced responsive documents, including without limitation the documents located at -5-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 6 of 36

defendant's production numbers G13525-G57610, G58369-G58656, G58674-G63440, G63464-G64845, and G65289-G66243. In addition, defendant will make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 2 [sic, 36]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the Army's fielding of the AN/PSS-14 hand-held mine detector devices.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant Specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer" and "fielding." Defendant interprets "fielding" to refer to the prioritization process by which AN/PSS-14 mine detectors are distributed to Army units throughout the world as such mine detectors become available. Furthermore, documents that "relate in .any way to the Army's fielding of the AN/PSS-14 hand-held mine detector devices" may

-6-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 7 of 36

include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to theforegoing general and specific objections, defendant will make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 3 [sic, 37]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which .you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the Government's purchase of the hand,held mine ..detection device(s) under the U.S. Army's Handheld Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program. Your response should include solicitation(s), requests for proposal(s) and request for quote(s) for purchase, contract(s), purchase order(s), voucher(s), DD Form 250(s), delivery order(s) and task order(s) regarding these purchases hand-held mine detection devices.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by -7-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 8 of 36

"to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the Government's purchase of the AN/PSS-14 hand-held mine detection device" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Defendant also objects to this request to the extent it is duplicative of plaintiff's Request No. 28. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant will also make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 4 [sic, 38]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the Army's fielding of the hand-held mine detector devices purchased under the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program.

-8-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 9 of 36

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope .because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer" and "fielding." Defendant interprets "fielding" to refer to the prioritization process by which HSTAMIDS mine detectors were distributed to Army units throughout the world as such mine detectors became available. Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the Army's fielding of the hand-held mine detector devices purchased under the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System.(HSTAMIDS) program" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant will also make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 5 [sic, 39]: Identify and provide, or make avai.lable for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which -9-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 10 of 36

relate in any way to the handheld mine detection devices purchased, by the Government and that are used to detect IEDs, including any classified documents..

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope .because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant does not have any responsive documents in its possession, custody, or control.

REQUEST NO. 6 [sic, 40]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the use of handheld mine detection devices to detect IEDs or counter-lEDs..

-10-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 11 of 36

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant does not have any responsive documents in its possession, custody, or control.

REQUEST NO. 7 [sic, 41]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the Request for Proposal and/or Solicitation issued by the Government for the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program, including any classified documents.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the Request for Proposal and/or Solicitation issued by the Government for the 11-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 12 of 36

U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant has already produced responsive documents, including without limitation the documents located at defendant's production numbers G29980-G38157, G41236-G47309, and G52951G57610. In addition, defendant will make documents not previously produced available forinspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia. Defendant does not have any responsive classified documents.in its possession, custody, or control.

REQUEST NO. 8 [sic, 42]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to meetings to discuss technical issues, including but not limitedto technical interchange meetings (TIMs), regarding or relating to the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program and/or the development of the AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detector devices. -12-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 13 of 36

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Defendant also objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome, unlimited in time, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Documents that "relate in any way to meetings to discuss technical issues, including but not limited to technical interchange meetings (TIMs), regarding or relating to the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program and/or the development of the AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detector devices" includes a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant has already produced responsive documents that were located as part of a reasonable search. In addition, defendant will make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

-13-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 14 of 36

REQUEST NO. 9 [sic, 43]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the engineering drawings, configuration control drawings, drawing packages, design and/or technical drawings provided to the Government regarding or relating to AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detection devices.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the engineering drawings, configuration control drawings, drawing packages, design and/or technical drawings provided to the Government regarding or relating to AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detection devices" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Defendant also objects to this request to the extent it is duplicative of plaintiff's Request No. 32. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant has already produced responsive documents,

-14-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 15 of 36

including without limitation the documents located at defendant's production numbers G64846-G65288. Defendant will be producing additional responsive documentsthat have been found as a result ofa reasonable search. Defendant furtherresponds that it did not purchase a Technical Data Package for the AN/PSS-14 mine detector, so defendant does not have a complete set of engineering drawings or configuration control documents for this system in its .possession, custody, or control.

REQUEST NO. 10 [sic, 44]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the engineering drawings, configuration control drawings, drawing packages, design and/or technical drawings provided to the Government regarding or relating to handheld mine detection devices produced under the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program.

-15-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 16 of 36

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the engineering drawings, configuration control drawings, drawing packages, design and/or technical drawings provided to the Government regarding or relating to handheld mine detection devices produced under the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Defendant also objects to this request to the extent it is duplicative of plaintiff's Request No. 32.. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant has already produced responsive documents, including without limitation the documents located at defendant's production numbers G64846-G65288. Defendant will be producing additional responsive documents that have been found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant further responds that it did not purchase a Technical Data Package for the HSTAMIDS mine detectors, so defendant does not have a complete set of engineering drawings or

16-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 17 of 36

configuration control documents for this system inits possession, custody, or control.

REQUEST NO. 11 [sic, 45]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the Government's plan and/or decision to replace the AN/PSS-12 with the AN/PSS-14.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the Government's plan and/or decision to replace the AN/PSS-12 with the AN/PSS-14" is ambiguous and may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant

-17-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 18 of 36

will also make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutuallyagreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 12[sic, 46]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the organizational charts for Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate (Night Vision), which is located at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia. Please limit your response to the time period of 1990 through 2000. Please include in your response any organizational charts for predecessor divisions of Night Vision during this same time period to the extent that these prior organizational charts cover the requested time period.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by. "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the organizational charts for Night Vision and Electronic Sensors

-18-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 19 of 36

Directorate (Night Vision), which is located at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant further responds that prior to September 1994, the Countermine Division of Night Vision was part of the Belvoir Research, Development and Engineering Center (BRDEC). When BRDEC was dissolved due to a Base Realignment and Closure decision, the Countermine Division was moved to Night Vision. Organization charts for BRDEC no longer exist.

REQUEST NO. 13 [sic, 47]: Identify and provide, or make. available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the [sic] Cyterra's proposals submitted to the Government regarding the provision, testing, design, sale, manufacturing of handheld mine detection devises [sic], including, but not limited to the humanitarian demining handheld detector. Include in your response Cyterra's proposals for the following contracts DAAB12-96-C-0014, -19-

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 20 of 36

DAAB15-01-C-0004, DAAB15-02-C-0015, DAAB15-02-C-0026, DAAB15-03-C-0025, DAAB15-03-C-0024, DAAB15-03-C-0031 and W909MY-04-C-0026.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects tothis request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the [sic] Cyterra's proposals submitted to the Government regarding the provision, testing, design, sale, manufacturing of handheld mine detection devises [sic]" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant has already produced responsive documents, including without limitation the documents located at defendant's production numbers G1.3525~G57610, G58369-G58656, and G58674-G63440. In addition, defendant will make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 21 of 36

¯ REQUEST NO. 14 [sic, 48]:¯ Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the engineer and/or design and/or technical drawings and/or drawing packages submitted to the Government by Cyterra regarding the provision, testing, design, sale, manufacturing of handheld mine detection devises [sic], including, but not limited to the humanitarian demining handheld detector. Include in your response drawings regarding or relating to the following contracts DAAB12-96-C-0014, DAAB15-01 -C-0004, DAAB15-02-C-0015, DAABi 5-02-C-0026, DAAB15-03-C-0025, DAAB15-03-C-0024, DAAB15-03-C-0031 and W909MY-04-C-0026. Also, include in your response the drawing package referenced in G051250, which was submitted to the Government in May 2004.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the. extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the -21 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 22 of 36

engineer and/or design and/or technical drawings and/or drawing packages submitted to the Government by Cyterra regarding the provision, testing, design, sale, manufacturing of handheld mine detection devises [sic]" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Defendant also objects to this request to the extent it is duplicative of plaintiff's Request Nos. 32 and 43. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant, has already produced responsive documents, including without limitation the documents located at defendant's production numbers G64846-G65288. Defendant will be producing additional responsive.documents that have been found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant further responds that it did not purchase a Technical Data Package for the HSTAMIDS or AN/PSS-14 mine detectors, so defendant does not have a complete set of engineering drawings or configuration control documents for this system in its possession, custody, or control. Defendant additionally responds that it could not locate the drawing package referenced in G051250 as part of a reasonable search.

- 22 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 23 of 36

REQUEST NO. 15 [sic, 49]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in anyway to the policies employed by Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate (NightVision) located at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia and/0r its predecessor divisions regarding or relating to the use of intellectual property, including, but not limited to the protection of intellectual property owned by entities other than the Government.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the policies employed by Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate (Night Vision) located at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia and/or its predecessor divisions regarding or relating to the use of intellectual property" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Defendant also objects to this request to the extent it seeks documents covered by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process - 23 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 24 of 36

privilege, or work product exemption. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant further responds that Night Vision is bound by the following statutes and regulations: 5 U.S.C. § 552a, 7 U.S.C. § 423, 15 U.S.C. §§ 3701-17, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, ~35 U.S.C. §§ 200-12, FAR 3.104 & 52.227, DFARS 252.227, AFARS 5127, and Army Regulation 27-60.

REQUEST NO. 16 [sic, 50]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the policies employed by the Army regarding or relating to the use of intellectual property, including, but not limited to the protection of intellectual property owned by entities other than the Government.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this. request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous; and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the - 24 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 25 of 36

policies employed by the Army regarding or relating to the use of intellectual property" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Defendant also objects to this request to the extent it seeks documents covered by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, or work .product exemption. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result Of a reasonable search. Defendant further responds that the Army is bound by the following statutes and regulations: 5 U.S.C. § 552a, 7 U.S.C. § 423, 15 U.S.C. §§ 3701-17, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, 35 U.S.C. §§ 200-12, FAR 3.104 & 52.227, DFARS 252.227, AFARS 5127, and Army Regulation 27-60.

REQUEST NO. 17 [sic, 51]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to the milestones on the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program, including., but not limited to the briefings presented for milestones 1,2, 3 and 4 and all contracts and/or

- 25 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 26 of 36

modifications and/or task orders awarded in support of these milestone efforts.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the milestones on the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program" is ambiguous and may include a Vastuniverse of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. ~Subject to the foregoing general and. specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant will also make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir; Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 18 [sic, 52]: identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which

- 26 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 27 of 36

relate in any way to the requests for funding for the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program.

Specific Objections and Response. Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to the requests for funding for the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) program" is ambiguous and may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant will also make documents not previously produced available for inspectionat a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 19 [sic, 53]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which

- 27 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 28 of 36

relate in any way to the requests for funding regarding or relating to AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detection devices.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore; documents that "relate in any way to the requests for funding regarding or relating to AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detection devices" is ambiguous and may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant will also make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 20 [sic, 54]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which

- 28 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 29 of 36

relate in any way to the termination of GDE's U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) contract.

Specific Objections .and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections,defendant responds that it did not terminate any of GDE's contracts related to HSTAMIDS. Therefore, defendant does not have any responsive documents in its possession, custody, or control.

REQUEST NO. 21 [sic, 55]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to justifications and/or findings of fact for issuance of modifications and/or for purchase(s) without using full and open competition regarding or relating to the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) contract and/or the AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detection devices. - 29 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 30 of 36

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to justifications and/or findings of fact for issuance of modifications and/or for )urchase(s) without using full and open competition" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections,, defendant has already produced responsive documents, including without limitation the documents located at defendant's production numbers G13525-G57610, G58369-G58656, and G58674-G63440.

REQUEST NO. 22 [sic, 56]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to Organizational Conflicts of Interest.(OCI) analyses performed regarding the purchase of handheld mine detection devices. Include in your response any such OCI analysis regarding or relating to the

- 30 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 31 of 36

purchase of handheld mine detection devices for use in Bosnia and/or for other humanitarian uses.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant does not have any responsive documents in its possession, custody, or control.

REQUEST.NO. 23 [sic, 57]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to deliverables under the.U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) contract and/or regarding or relating ¯ to the AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detection devices.

-31 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 32 of 36

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to deliverables under the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) contract and/or regarding or relating to the AN/PSS-14 handheld mine detection devices" may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, defendant has already produced responsive documents, including without limitation the documents located at defendant's production numbers G13525-G57610, G58369-G58656, and G58674-G63440. In addition, defendant will make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 24 [sic, 58]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you relied, or which relate in any way to Government Operational Requirements documents - 32 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 33 of 36

that were used by the Government as a basis to procure handheld mine detection devices.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to the extent it is vague, ~ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any way to Government Operational Requirements documents that were used by the Government as a basis to procure handheld mine detection devices" is ambiguous and may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Subject to the.foregoing general and specific objections, defendant will produce responsive documents that were found as a result of a reasonable search. Defendant will also make documents not previously produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.

REQUEST NO. 25 [sic, 59]: Identify and provide, or make available for inspection and copying, any and all documents to which you refer, upon which you r,~lied, or which - 33 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 34 of 36

relate in any way to antenna studies that were conducted after the conclusion of the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) contract. Include in your answer the studies referenced by Dr. Broach in his deposition.

Specific Objections and Response Defendant specifically objects to this request to .the extent it is vague, ambiguous, and unlimited in scope because it is not clear what is meant by "to which you refer." Furthermore, documents that "relate in any. way to antenna studies that were conducted after the conclusion of the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) contract" is ambiguous and may include a vast universe of documents that are not relevant to these proceedings. Defendant interprets "antenna studies that were conducted after the conclusion of the U.S. Army's Hand-held Standoff Mine Detection System (HSTAMIDS) contract" to mean the "HSTAMIDS Red Team" effort. Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections,

- 34 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 35 of 36

defendant will make documents not previously, produced available for inspection at a mutually agreeable time at Ft. Belvoir,Virginia.

Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General JOHN FARGO Director

Of Counsel: GARY L. HAUSKEN Attorney U.S. Department of Justice

UDALLA Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530 Telephone: (202) 307-0334 Facsimile: (202) 307-0345 Attorneys for Defendant

Janua~ 29,2007

- 35 -

Case 1:04-cv-01376-LMB

Document 42-2

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 36 of 36

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy of "DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FOURTH SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS TO DEFENDANT" was sent by facsimile and first.class mail, postage prepaid, this 29th day of January 2007 to: Thomas O. Mason, Esq. Williams Mullen A Professional Corporation 8270 Greensboro Drive Suite 700 McLean, VA 22102 Phone: (703) 760-5200 Facsimile: (703) 748-0244 Counsel for Plaintiff

Elizabeth D. Elliott U.S. Department of Justice Telephone: (202) 514-6681