Free Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 26.4 kB
Pages: 5
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 699 Words, 4,578 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/17601/17.pdf

Download Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims ( 26.4 kB)


Preview Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:04-cv-00461-BAF

Document 17

Filed 09/09/2004

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. )

No. 04-461C (Judge Diane Gilbert Sypolt)

JOINT PRELIMINARY STATUS REPORT Pursuant to Rule 16 and Appendix A, Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims, the parties submit the following Joint Preliminary Status Report in response to questions set forth in paragraph III(4) of Appendix A. a. Jurisdiction:

The parties currently perceive no jurisdictional defects in this case. b. The Consolidation: parties do not believe that this case should be

consolidated with any other case. c. Bifurcation:

The parties do not believe that the trial of liability and quantum should be bifurcated.

F:\docs\HALLL\PLD\4460035JPSR.wpd

Case 1:04-cv-00461-BAF

Document 17

Filed 09/09/2004

Page 2 of 5

d.

Deferral:

The parties know of no reason to defer proceedings in this case pending consideration of any other case presently before the Court. e. Remand/Suspension:

See response to item c, above. f. Joinder:

The parties do not believe any other party will be joined. g. Dispositive Motions:

The parties do not anticipate filing dispositive motions prior to the completion of discovery but may reassess the filing of dispositive motions during the discovery period. h. Relevant Issues: l. Whether the Government's structural steel design

drawings were defective and whether such defective design delayed the detailing, fabrication and erection of structural steel. 2. Whether the Government also unreasonably delayed in

responding to Steel Service's RFI's and in reviewing and approving Steel Service's shop drawings and whether such delays caused Steel Service to miss its fabrication windows, thereby rendering its performance more expensive. 3. Whether the VA breached its implied warranty of the

adequacy of its plans and specifications.

F:\docs\HALLL\PLD\4460035JPSR.wpd

2

Case 1:04-cv-00461-BAF

Document 17

Filed 09/09/2004

Page 3 of 5

4.

Whether the VA breached its implied duty not to

delay, disrupt or hinder Steel Service's performance. 5. Whether the VA's failure to issue complete and

adequate structural steel design drawings, its failure to promptly provide responses to cure the defects in its drawings and its failure to review and approve shop drawings within a reasonable time constitute constructive chances and/or an unreasonable

suspension of the work, entitling Steel Service to compensation. 6. Whether Steel Service is entitled to recover the

approximate amount of $3,447,100.37, together with interest and costs. i. Settlement:

The plaintiff suggests that settlement negotiations should occur as discovery proceeds, or at the completion of discovery. Plaintiff wishes to pursue alternative dispute resolution and will discuss the matter with defendant. If the parties determine to

pursue alternative dispute resolution, we will notify the Court promptly. j. Both Trial: parties anticipate proceeding toward trial should

discovery reveal that dispositive motions, ADR, or settlement are inappropriate. Plaintiff recommends that trial be held in Jackson, Mississippi.

F:\docs\HALLL\PLD\4460035JPSR.wpd

3

Case 1:04-cv-00461-BAF

Document 17

Filed 09/09/2004

Page 4 of 5

k.

Discovery:

The parties request an initial discovery period of eight months, commencing with the approval of this joint preliminary status report. The parties also recommend that they file a joint

status report proposing further proceedings within 30 days after the close of discovery. (1) Other Information:

There is no other information of which the Court should be made aware at this time. 5. Proposed Discovery Plan: a. b. Fact Discovery Disclosure of Expert Reports ­- 70 days before discovery deadline. c. Depositions. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director s/Bryant G. Snee BRYANT G. SNEE Assistant Director s/Brian S. Smith BRIAN S. SMITH Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530

F:\docs\HALLL\PLD\4460035JPSR.wpd

4

Case 1:04-cv-00461-BAF

Document 17

Filed 09/09/2004

Page 5 of 5

Telephone: (202) 616-0391 Fax: (202) 353-7988 Attorneys for Defendant s/David W. Mockbee MOCKBEE HALL & DRAKE, P.A. Lamar Life Building, 10th Floor 317 East Capitol Street Jackson, Mississippi 39201 601/353-0035 Telephone 601/353-0045 Facsimile Attorney for Plaintiff September 9, 2004

F:\docs\HALLL\PLD\4460035JPSR.wpd

5