Free Order - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 38.9 kB
Pages: 1
Date: July 10, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 282 Words, 1,802 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/16254/67.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Federal Claims ( 38.9 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:03-cv-02028-FMA

Document 67

Filed 07/10/2007

Page 1 of 1

In The United States Court of Federal Claims
Nos. 03-2028T & 04-907T (Filed: July 10, 2007) __________ KENNETH C. KEENER, el al Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. _________ ORDER __________ On April 18, 2007, a published opinion was issued in this case granting defendant's motion for partial summary judgment, concluding that the court lacked jurisdiction over plaintiffs' allegations regarding the untimely assessment of tax attributable to partnership items, and allegations regarding the propriety of the assessment of tax motivated interest under former 26 U.S.C. § 6621(c). Keener v. United States, 76 Fed. Cl. 455 (2007). On May 22, 2007, plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment was denied as moot. On August 11, 2005, this court stayed proceedings on plaintiffs' allegations regarding failure to abate the assessment of interest (including tax motivated interest under former 26 U.S.C. § 6621(c)) pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6404(e)(1), pending the appeal in Hinck v. United States, 446 F.3d 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2006). On May 21, 2007, the Supreme Court issued its decision and opinion affirming the decision of the Federal Circuit, Hinck v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2011 (2007), and on June 22, 2007, judgment was entered. On June 20, 2007, the parties filed a joint status report indicating that, based on the Supreme Court's decision in Hinck, this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs' interest abatement claims. Accordingly, on or before August 8, 2007, the parties shall either file a joint stipulation of dismissal of this remaining claim, or plaintiffs, defendant, or both parties, shall file an appropriate motion. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Francis M. Allegra Francis M. Allegra Judge