Free Notice (Other) - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 1 of 40

ATTACHMENT 1: OBJECTIONS TO SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT'S DEPOSITION AND TRIAL TESTIMONY DESIGNATIONS AND THE GOVERNMENT'S DEPOSITION AND TRIAL TESTIMONY COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS

1. CHRISTOPHER BAJWA Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of February 18, 2004 36:3-38:13 Foundation; assumes facts not in evidence; mischaracterizes prior testimony; relevance; speculation Objection

Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of February 18, 2004 108:17-109:5

2. LAKE BARRETT Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of April 22, 2002 27:13 - 40:4 49:2 - 60:22 85:1 - 96:22 116:14 - 124:22 149:5 - 149:21 153:3 - 156:22 1 Lack of foundation Lack of foundation; calls for speculation Calls for speculation Calls for speculation; vague; overly broad; calls for legal conclusion Overly broad; calls for speculation Calls for speculation; vague Objection

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 2 of 40

196:13 - 200:22 205:1 - 208:22 217:1 - 220:22 260:4 - 261:15 Deposition Testimony Of April 23, 2002 337:1 - 352:22

Calls for speculation Calls for speculation Mischaracterizes prior testimony Calls for speculation

Lack of foundation; vague; best evidence; hearsay; calls for speculation; hypothetical; assumes facts not in evidence; relevance Calls for speculation; lack of foundation Speculation; calls for legal conclusion Calls for legal conclusion Best evidence Best evidence; hearsay; speculation; hypothetical; calls for speculation Calls for speculation Calls for speculation; calls for legal conclusion Calls for speculation; legal conclusion; lack of foundation Relevance; calls for legal conclusion; relevance Vague; overly broad; calls for speculation; calls for legal conclusion Calls for speculation; assumes facts not in evidence; lacks foundation; hearsay; best evidence Hearsay; best evidence; lacks foundation; Mischaracterizes prior testimony; calls for speculation; calls for legal conclusion Lacks foundation; vague; calls for speculation Lacks foundation; calls for speculation 2

401:1 - 404:22 409:1 - 412:22 414:3 - 415:9 425:12 - 427:13 449:1 - 456:22 473:1 - 476:22 489:1 - 492:22 521:1 - 523:2 555:1 - 574:22 579:1 - 594:22 607:1 - 608:22

610:1 - 614:22

619:1 - 622:22 707:1 - 710:22

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 3 of 40

715:1 - 718:22 739:1 - 742:22 761:19 - 763:12 771:1 - 782:22 787:1 - 798:22

Lacks foundation; calls for speculation Calls for speculation Mischaracterizes prior testimony Assumes facts not in evidence Calls for speculation; lack of foundation; calls for legal conclusion; best evidence; argumentative

Deposition Testimony Of April 8, 2002 910:1 - 925:22 942:1 - 953:22 962:1 - 965:22 1062:1 - 1065:22 1094:1 - 1099:13 Deposition Testimony Of May 10, 2002 1153:19 - 1154:15 1244:1 - 1247:22 1301:1 - 1301:22 1328:1 - 1343:22 1368:1 - 1375:22 1416:1 - 1427:22 Deposition Testimony Of May 14, 2002 67:20 - 68:21 71:2 - 72:18 118:1 - 125:25 3 Calls for speculation Calls for speculation Calls for speculation; lack of foundation Calls for speculation Calls for speculation; calls for legal conclusion Lack of foundation Calls for speculation; best evidence; lack of foundation; calls for legal conclusion Calls for legal conclusion Calls for speculation; lack of foundation Calls for speculation; lack of foundation; calls for legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony; lack of foundation Calls for speculation; lack of foundation; calls for legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony; compound Lack of foundation

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 4 of 40

140:8 - 143:2 144:14 - 145:4 173:16 - 176:9 176:14 - 178:12 Deposition Testimony Of May 15, 2002 339:13 - 340:21 363:19 - 363:24 394:11 - 397:10 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony of April 22, 2002 47:11-22 48:1-18 137:11-22 138:1-6 140:21-22 141:1-22 142:1-17 144:16-22 145:1-13 209:17-22 210:1-22 211:1-10 256:5-22 257:1-22 258:1-2 Deposition Testimony of April 26, 2002 545:21-22 546:1-6 549:1-14 595:1-7 633:20-22 634:1-12 686:9-22 4

Lack of foundation Calls for speculation; calls for legal conclusion Calls for speculation; lack of foundation Calls for legal conclusion

Lack of foundation Calls for speculation Calls for speculation; lack of foundation

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 5 of 40

687:1-22 688:1-22 689: 1­7 743: 1-6 Deposition Testimony Of May 8, 2002 851:5-22 852:1-2 1044:1-22 Deposition Testimony Of May 10, 2002 1202:5-22 1203:1-14 Deposition Testimony Of May 14, 2002 66:18-25 67:1-14 69:4-25 70:1-8 90:3-15 143:3-21 144:1-8 223:8-25 224:1-11 Deposition Testimony Of May 15, 2002 364:11-19

3. RITA BOWSER Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of September 16, 2004 239:17-23 Foundation; leading Objection

5

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 6 of 40

Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of September 16, 2004 25:22 - 26:10 47:13-20 54:8-15 55:11-14 56:12-18 58:23 - 59:3 61:4-14 65:4-9 93:19-22 96:6-10 108:15-22 119:12-13 121:2-8 129:5-17 134:2-6 134:16-19 153:4-21 154:15 - 155:8 201:6-16 208:8-20 228:2-22 229:24 - 230:5

4. ALAN BROWNSTEIN Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony of April 9, 2002 65:16 - 70:24 144:14 - 144:18 Deposition Testimony Of April 10, 2002 343:17 - 344:8 Calls for speculation 6 Calls for speculation; calls for legal conclusion Calls for legal conclusion Objection

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 7 of 40

441:5 - 443:19 455:24 - 457:14 Deposition Testimony Of April 23, 2002 104:18 - 107:13 153:19 - 155:25 216:10 - 220:20 Deposition Testimony Of June 14, 2002 292:15 - 305:11 340:15 - 340:21 342:20 - 343:20 423:20 - 428:5

Calls for speculation Calls for speculation

Assumes facts not in evidence; lacks foundation Lacks foundation; calls for legal conclusion Calls for legal conclusion; mischaracterizes prior testimony

Relevance; lacks foundation Relevance Relevance; hearsay Calls for legal conclusion; calls for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney client privilege

Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of April 9, 2002 56:9-14 144:19-25 145:1-6 Deposition Testimony Of April 10, 2002 343:4-14 375:19 412:5-14 413:13-20 443:20 - 444:8 Deposition Testimony Of April 23, 2002 19:17-25 20:1-19 23:14-25 24:1-10 7

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 8 of 40

26:24-25 27:1-25 28:1-9 54:12-23

5. PATRICE BUBAR Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of May 20, 2004 10:4 - 11:2 18-16 - 19:3 20:16 - 21:8 Trial Testimony Of August 12, 2004 5006:14 - 5009:25 5017:11 - 5018:9 5027:4 - 5081:7 5082:13 - 5091:23 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of May 20, 2004 7:14-16 10:1-3 395:14 - 397:16 377:8 - 378:7 Trial Testimony Of August 12, 2004 5018:10-22 5094:17 - 5096:2 5096:23 - 5097:17 Calls for a legal conclusion Improper impeachment Relevance; Attorney-client privilege; Speculation Speculation Vague Calls for a legal conclusion Foundation Objection

8

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 9 of 40

6. ROBERT CAMPBELL Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of June 13, 2002 23:17 - 25:14 47:24 - 48:21 60:5 - 62:3 84:19-24 94:3 - 95:22 125:18 - 129:22 150:12 - 152:24; 153:15 - 54:25; 156:18 - 57:7 161:22 - 162:3 162:9 - 63:16 165:12 - 167:18; 167:24 - 171:13 175:20 - 176:1 200:9 - 206:16 212:11 - 213:4 Deposition Testimony Of June 14, 2002 285:23 - 286:10 286:23 - 287:18 396:1-17 406:15 - 408:12 415:19 - 416:23 9 Vague; foundation; speculation Vague; foundation; speculation Speculation; relevance Vague; foundation; speculation Vague Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance; speculation Legal conclusion; foundation; speculation Best evidence Relevance; speculation Objection

Vague Best evidence; legal conclusion Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation; speculation Relevance; speculation

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 10 of 40

444:20 - 445:25 Deposition Testimony Of May 6, 2004 15:1 - 16:1 16:21 - 17:13 18:18 - 19:7 115:3 - 116:9 139:16 - 141:20 146:18 - 147:14 170:17 - 171:15 174:20 - 75:17 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of June 13, 2002 19:17 - 21:1 58:5 - 60:3 76:11 - 77:21 80:8 - 81:1 87:5 - 88:22 95:25 - 96:11 113:17 - 114:15 157:8 - 158:22 175:13-18 210:6-25 Deposition Testimony of June 14, 2002 392:12 - 393:9 396:19 - 397:9 412:23 - 413:16 Deposition Testimony of January 29, 2003 565:14-25 632:8-16

Legal conclusion

Relevance Relevance Relevance Speculation; foundation Best evidence Best evidence Best evidence; vague Foundation

10

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 11 of 40

Deposition Testimony of May 6, 2004 17:14 - 18:21 115:3 - 118:12 139:1-15 145:18 - 146:17 170:13 - 171:11 171:16 - 174:19

7. JAMES CARLSON Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of February 12, 2004 6:7 - 7:6 17:16 - 18:5 18:13-19 19:3-9 19:11-14 23:11 - 24:17 69:19 - 70:8 71:3-10 71:21 - 72:5 72:7-11 77:5-16 78:13-19 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of February 12, 2004 7:7-9 11 Foundation Assumes facts not in evidence Mischaracterizes prior testimony Vague Vague Vague Vague; legal conclusion Vague; legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony Vague; foundation Compound; vague; legal conclusion Vague Objection

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 12 of 40

64:6-18

8. S. DAVID FREEMAN Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of July 16, 2004 11:13 - 12:1 35:10 - 35:16 37:22 - 38:14 41:13 - 45:2 53:12 - 55:15 57:20 - 57:25 63:3 - 66:22 73:23 - 74:17 76:13 - 77:17 84:4 - 85:15 112:14 - 115:14 121:25 - 124:1 131:11 - 133:12 136:22 - 137:15 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of July 16, 2004 18:22 - 19:11 24:11-23 28:10-20 36:18-21 38:15-22 48:13-22 12 Foundation Foundation; incomplete Foundation; legal conclusion Foundation; legal conclusion Foundation; relevance Incomplete Foundation; legal conclusion Foundation; legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation; legal conclusion Foundation; legal conclusion Foundation Legal conclusion Foundation Objection

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 13 of 40

57:16-19 58:1-7 58:17-22 62:16 - 63:2 71:13 - 72:1 72:13-18 75:3 - 75:14 83:20 - 84:3 87:20 - 88:14 102:1-12 108:21-25 110:15 - 112:13 115:15 - 116:17

9. DAVID HUIZENGA Objections: Designation Trial Testimony of August 10, 2004 4395:7 - 4397:27 4402:21 - 4404:2 4406:7 - 4407:3 4408:9 - 4409:3 4410:6 - 4412:1-7 4413:1 - 4415:1 4417:1 - 4426:8 4440:4 - 4443:8 4446:17 - 4449:16 4452:9-16 4514:19 - 4515:25 4515:1-25 4522:8-12 Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Objection

13

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 14 of 40

4527:7 - 4530:25 4536:7 - 4537:9 4539:10-13 Counter-Designations: Trial Testimony Of August 10, 2004 4374:23 - 4375:21 4386:14-19 4401:14 - 4402:20 4407:4 - 4408:8 4409:4-11 4412:8-25 4415:2 - 4416:25 4443:9-21 4511:21 - 4512:6 4521:15 - 4523:7 4525:11-24 4531:1-10 4535:16 - 4536:6 4537:10-20 4538:2-12 4544:12 - 4545:16 4546:24 - 4547:4

Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance

10. KEITH KLEIN Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of May 22, 2002 54:23 - 57:10 58:3-20 86:7-15 Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Speculation Objection

14

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 15 of 40

Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of May 22, 2002 57:11 - 58:2 62:21 - 63:10 74:10 - 77:18 79:8-17 80:17-22 84:4-13 110:24 - 111:13 112:3-7 135:1-5 139:12 - 140:3

11. SUSAN KLEIN Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of April 24, 2002 61:20 - 62:14 77:1 - 80:22 80:6-8 82:8 - 83:19 84:16 - 85:1 104:1-13 106:12-14 109:9 - 110:9 Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice1 Relevance; speculation Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; vague Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; legal conclusion Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; legal conclusion; relevance; speculation Objection

Exhibit 1 to Ms. Klein's deposition identifies the topics upon which she was designated to testify as the Government's RCFC 30(b)(6) witness. Appendix at Susan Klein tab. 15

1

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 16 of 40

122:21 - 123:4 132:16 - 133:3 143:20 - 144:15 146:22 - 147:15 149:1 - 150:21 165:4 - 166:21 171:11-19 172:7-14 182:10 - 184:22 196:1-17 212:13 - 213:2 231:19-22 232:22 - 233:4 234:4-17 239:13-16 240:19 - 241:6 252:19 - 253:5 Deposition Testimony Of April 25, 2002 283:16 - 284:6 285:2-4 285:15 - 286:10 288:21 - 291:11 324:8 - 325:1 340:17 - 342:3

Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; relevance; speculation Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Legal conclusion; speculation Relevance Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Relevance Relevance Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; relevance Relevance Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice

Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance; best evidence Relevance 16

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 17 of 40

351:6 - 352:21 354:1-16 388:11 - 389:12 405:10 - 407:4 440:14-19 444:9 -18 460:18 - 461:12 504:1 - 505:2 512:16-22 516:13-17 524:1 - 525:8 528:2-7 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of April 24, 2002 57:10 - 58:7 104:14-20 110:10-12 123:5-7 139:7 - 140:6 247:5-16 Deposition Testimony Of April 25, 2002 342:4-18 354:17 - 355:13 435:16 - 438:21 439:15 - 440:9 440:21 - 448:1 448:11 - 449:4

Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; relevance; best evidence Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; best evidence Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; legal conclusion; best evidence Relevance Vague Vague; legal conclusion Speculation; best evidence Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Speculation; hypothetical Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice; speculation; hypothetical Speculation; hypothetical

17

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 18 of 40

490:13-492:9 502:4-21 503:6-8

12. DAVID LANGSTAFF Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of November 4, 2004 7:22 - 8:17 29:18 - 32:15 36:12-15 37:4-15 37:22 - 38:15 64:6 - 65:9 67:17-22 74:6-18 77:21 - 82:22 Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance; vague; calls for speculation; foundation; best evidence Relevance; vague Relevance; vague Relevance; foundation; vague; calls for speculation; assumes facts; mischaracterizes prior testimony; best evidence Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation; best evidence; calls for speculation Relevance; foundation; assumes facts not in evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence; calls for speculation; mischaracterizes prior testimony; incomplete quotation Objection

84:15 - 85:22 91:13 - 92:2 95:12 - 101:7 103:15 - 105:3 108:3-22

18

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 19 of 40

109:18 - 110:16 111:10 - 114:12 119:19-22 125:8 - 126:22 149:5-15 150:10 - 152:6 153:14 - 154:3 178:6-19 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of November 4, 2004 62:7 - 64:5 74:19 - 75:15 92:3-6 93:13 - 95:11 101:8 - 102:13 117:16 - 119:18 124:13 - 125:1 129:12 - 135:3 154:4 - 155:15 157:4 - 158:22 178:20 - 179:19

Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation; calls for speculation Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation; mischaracterizes prior testimony Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; assumes facts; calls for speculation Relevance Relevance; foundation; vague

13. MICHAEL LAWRENCE Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of May 20, 2002 43:23 - 44:20 45:11-21 Foundation Foundation 19 Objection

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 20 of 40

50:5-16 52:18-25 53:4-9 53:10-21 54:1 - 55:2 55:8 - 56:7 60:23 - 61:14 62:4-15 63:4-12 64:7 - 65:8 65:14-22 66:7-16 68:4-13 69:6-16 69:17-25 78:5-15 78:16-23 78:24 - 79:15 79:16 - 81:18 82:5 - 83:10 83:4-14 84:1-13 84:14 - 85:2 85:10-21 86:7-23 86:24 - 87:9 87:10 - 88:8 20

Speculation Vague Foundation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation Legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony Foundation Foundation Foundation; speculation Asked and answered Foundation; speculation Compound Assumes facts not in evidence Legal conclusion; compound Legal conclusion; vague Vague Foundation Foundation Foundation Foundation; vague Legal conclusion Foundation; best evidence Legal conclusion; foundation Mischaracterizes prior testimony Foundation; legal conclusion

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 21 of 40

90:4-24 91:9-23 92:17 - 93:25 98:4 - 99:11 99:12-20 101:24-25 131:1-7 144:9 - 145:3 145:4-11 145:17-24 145:25 - 146:14 146:19 - 147:15 148:19 - 149:2 149:10 - 150:6 150:11-25 153:8-19 186:10-22 188:14 - 189:3 189:4-9 198:4-15 198:16 - 199:7 199:8-15 200:25 - 201:7 203:4 - 204:4 205:8 - 206:7 206:8-17 209:6-12 21

Foundation; legal conclusion Vague Compound; incomplete Foundation; legal conclusion Foundation; legal conclusion; vague Vague; incomplete Legal conclusion Foundation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation; vague Legal conclusion Foundation; speculation Foundation Legal conclusion Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation; vague Foundation; speculation Vague; speculation Foundation Legal conclusion Asked and answered Mischaracterizes prior testimony Vague Speculation; compound Foundation; speculation

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 22 of 40

210:6-24 211:3-8 211:9 - 212:4 212:5-19 214:1-7 214:8-19 217:17 - 218:11 219:8-16 220:14 - 221:23 Deposition Testimony Of May 21, 2002 244:1-6 244:21 - 245:14 245:15 - 246:2 246:16 - 247:21 247:22 - 248:8 249:12-19 250:2-13 301:8-13 302:24 - 303:8 304:2-18 305:25 - 307:6 320:8-19 321:15 - 322:2 322:3-24 323:21 - 324:6 324:7-13

Asked and answered Speculation Mischaracterizes prior testimony Asked and answered; speculation Best evidence Foundation; vague Legal conclusion Speculation; compound Foundation; speculation

Speculation; legal conclusion; best evidence Foundation Foundation; legal conclusion Compound Legal conclusion Foundation Foundation; speculation; asked and answered Speculation Legal conclusion Speculation; legal conclusion; asked and answered; mischaracterizes prior testimony Foundation; speculation Best evidence Speculation; legal conclusion Legal conclusion Asked and answered Asked and answered; legal conclusion

22

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 23 of 40

327:5-23 328:18 - 329:10 329:11-22 330:2-8 332:3-19 332:20 - 333:4 333:12 - 334:5 334:6-16 334:17 - 335:8 335:22 - 337:12 338:8-22 338:23 - 339:9 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of May 20, 2002 21:24 - 22:1 140:22 - 141:25 185:17-25 Deposition Testimony Of May 21, 2002 243:20-25 252:1-18

Foundation; speculation Legal conclusion; relevance; speculation Speculation; legal conclusion Legal conclusion Speculation; best evidence Legal conclusion; speculation Legal conclusion; best evidence Legal conclusion; vague Legal conclusion Legal conclusion; best evidence Foundation; speculation Best evidence

14. SALOMON LEVY Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of June 22, 2004 108:11 - 111:13 Speculation; hypothetical Objection

23

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 24 of 40

143:7-11 143:12-18 143:19-22 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of June 22, 2004 53:8-19 81:16 - 82:22 91:11 - 92:2 105:9 - 106:13 115:6 - 116:4 127:5-19 144:20-11 148:20 - 149:12 15. RONALD MILNER Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of May 1, 2002 0408:1 - 0411-25 0414:10-22 0415:1 - 0418:25 0419:1 - 0422:25 0423:22 - 0424:18 0425:1 - 0427:2 Deposition Testimony Of May 2, 2002 0434:18 - 0438:25

Leading Leading Leading

Objection

Relevance; foundation; calls for a legal conclusion; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; vague; calls for a legal conclusion; best evidence Relevance; foundation; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; foundation; best evidence

Relevance; foundation; best evidence

24

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 25 of 40

0439:8-22 0440:7-16 0441:1 - 0448:25 0449:1 - 0450:19 0451:1 - 0456:25 0457:1 - 0464:25 0465:1 - 0472:25 0473:1 - 0480:25 Deposition Testimony Of May 3, 2002 410:1 - 415:25 418:18-25 419:15-25 422:1-25 447:2 - 448:1 448:9-15 476:16 - 477:13 499:16 - 500:16 509:1-25 513:1-25 524:1 - 527:25 552:1 - 563:25

Relevance; foundation; calls for a legal conclusion; best evidence Relevance Relevance; best evidence Relevance; vague; best evidence Relevance; foundation; calls for a legal conclusion; best evidence Relevance; best evidence; calls for a legal conclusion; vague Relevance; best evidence Relevance; calls for a legal conclusion

Relevance; best evidence; foundation; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; vague; foundation; best evidence Relevance; vague; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; calls for speculation Relevance; calls for speculation Relevance; foundation; calls for speculation; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; foundation; calls for a legal conclusion; calls for speculation Relevance; calls for a legal conclusion; calls for speculation; assumes facts not in evidence Relevance; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; calls for speculation; best evidence; foundation Relevance; best evidence; vague; calls for speculation 25

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 26 of 40

568:1 - 578:25 Deposition Testimony Of May 7, 2002 14:17 - 15:13 17:5 - 25:21 28:11 - 32:11 37:9-22 40:5-11 42:1 - 44:25 Deposition Testimony Of May 8, 2002 59:21 - 60:19 61:6-14 155:4 - 156:1 194:22 - 196:3 221:21 - 226:4 226:8-22 228:19 - 229:20 262:1 - 264:2 266:22 - 270:11 270:17-25; 272:1-22

Relevance; best evidence; calls for speculation; calls for a legal conclusion

Relevance; best evidence Relevance; best evidence; foundation; calls for speculation; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; best evidence; calls for a legal conclusion; calls for speculation; vague Calls for a legal conclusion; foundation Relevance; foundation Foundation; calls for a legal conclusion; calls for speculation

Calls for speculation; calls for a legal conclusion Calls for a legal conclusion; calls for speculation Relevance; best evidence; calls for a legal conclusion; calls for speculation Relevance; calls for speculation; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; best evidence Relevance; best evidence Relevance; vague; best evidence; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; best evidence Relevance; calls for a legal conclusion; calls for speculation Relevance

26

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 27 of 40

273:5 - 276:9 283:10 - 284:7 285:3-20 Trial Testimony Of August 11, 2004 4744:21 - 4764:21 4766:17 - 4779:15

Relevance; calls for speculation; calls for a legal conclusion Relevance; best evidence Relevance; best evidence

Relevance; calls for a legal conclusion; best evidence Relevance; best evidence; calls for speculation

Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of May 1, 2002 41:3-25 46:1-6 68:25 - 69:12 72:9 - 73:9 107:22 - 108:25 132:2 - 133:4 193:23-25 Deposition Testimony Of May 2, 2002 232:22 - 233:21 245:19-25 301:10-18 304:5-15 305:2-22 317:24 - 318:21 325:24 - 326:7 327:22 - 329:25 Deposition Testimony Of May 3, 2002 416:8 - 418:17 419:1-14 420:1 - 421:25 435:16 - 436:5 440:13 - 441:1 27

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 28 of 40

441:21 - 443:8 443:16 - 444:8 446:12 - 447:1 448:2-8 448:16-24 450:12 - 451:18 454:11 - 455:22 465:14-25 475:8 - 476:15 486:12-20 487:12 - 488:5 488:14 - 489:10 493:4 - 496:8 506:7 - 507:7 512:5-15 514:4-13 Deposition Testimony Of May 7, 2002 592:14-19 Deposition Testimony Of May 7, 2002 6:9 - 10:18 32:21 - 33:24 41:8 - 42:1 Deposition Testimony Of May 8, 2002 52:8 - 53:19 61:18 - 62:15 73:10-24 77:3-20 90:7-24 99:8 - 100:3 100:18 - 102:1 103:1 - 105:24 106:7-20 136:17 - 137:8 138:6-25 174:5 - 175:11 184:17 - 186:11 193:13 - 194:20 196:8-24 28

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 29 of 40

197:23 - 198:4 202:15 - 203:4 204:1 - 207:12 208:7 - 209:5 210:2 - 211:7 233:7 - 234:9 256:11 - 257:10 272:14 - 273:4 279:10 - 280:3 280:12 - 281:2 Trial Testimony Of August 11, 2004 4741:19 - 4742:11 4788:23 - 4789:24 16. ROBERT MORGAN Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of March 21, 2002 38:5-11 42:2 - 43:23 46:18-24 48:2 - 49:2 74:9-23 108:3 - 109:15 124:9-24 138:22 - 141:4 204:20-24 208:8 - 209:12 Deposition Testimony Of March 22, 2002 223:6 - 224:1 Speculation Incomplete Foundation; legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Foundation; legal conclusion Vague; relevance Legal conclusion Foundation Legal conclusion Relevance Objection

29

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 30 of 40

225:19 - 227:16 313:18 - 315:1 Deposition Testimony Of June 25, 2002 135:6-14 Trial Testimony Of August 3, 2004 3674:11 - 3675:23 3676:15-25 3677:15 - 3678:7 3682:9 - 3683:19 3684:1-23 3685:10-16 3686:18-22 3690:12 - 3692:13 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of March 21, 2002 16:3-25 39:15-25 43:24 - 45:23 52:15 - 53:25 57:15-23 58:11 - 59:6 123:14 - 124:8 129:1-18 202:13 - 204:19 209:1-19 Trial Testimony Of August 3, 2004 3642:1 - 3649:16 3666:17 - 3667:1 3669:15-25 3677:1-14 3683:20-25 30

Foundation; speculation Vague; foundation

Foundation

Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion; relevance Foundation; relevance

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 31 of 40

3685:2-9 3686:13-17 3690:3-11

17. STEPHEN O'CONNOR Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of February 18, 2004 33:19 - 34:8 35:2-18 90:2 - 91:2 91:4-15 95:18 - 96:21 97:1-19 107:1-7 107:9-14 107:15-19 107:21 - 108:4 107:21 - 108:4 108:22 - 109:2 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of February 18, 2004 109:3-5 Foundation Foundation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation; vague Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation; vague Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation Foundation; speculation Objection

31

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 32 of 40

18. ROGER POWERS Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of June 23, 2004 61:10-22 75:18 - 76:21 81:13 - 84:21 86:16 - 87:6 88:19 - 97:7 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of June 23, 2004 37:14-22 39:17 - 42:4 48:10 - 49:7 59:13 - 60:5 77:9-22 79:21 - 80:5 80:19 - 81:11 84:22 - 85:4 86:10-15 97:8-14 103:2 - 104:3 129:9-10 138:8 - 139:21 141:14 - 142:2 147:19 - 148:5 151:8 - 152:7 Relevance Foundation; speculation; relevance Foundation; speculation; relevance Foundation; speculation; relevance Foundation; speculation; relevance Objection

32

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 33 of 40

19. ROBERT ROSSELLI Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of April 15, 2002 50:12 - 52:2 68:9-22; 69:5 - 72:15 119:10-18; 134:23 - 135:5; 136:24 - 144:19 146:19 - 148:20 154:13-19; 156:7 - 158:10 164:1-3; 166:23 - 169:2 180:9-21 Deposition Testimony Of April 16, 2002 190:18 - 191:5 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of April 15, 2002 47:9 - 48:17 49:6 - 50:11 53:20 - 54:15 68:23 - 69:4 121:3 - 122:7 122:18 - 123:6 154:20 - 155:7 176:9 - 177:12 Speculation Relevance Speculation; vague Relevance; speculation; legal conclusion Objection

Speculation; legal conclusion Relevance; asked and answered; speculation Speculation Relevance; best evidence

33

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 34 of 40

20. BEN RUSCHE Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of May 16, 2002 42:1 - 49:25 154:2 - 161:25 170:1 - 173:25 242:1 - 249:25 298:1 - 300:19 Deposition Testimony Of May 17, 2002 329:1 - 332:25 337:1 - 344:22 365:1 - 380:22 Trial Testimony Of August 3, 2004 3734:12-21 3739:4 - 3756:4 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of May 16, 2002 152:22 - 154:1 162:1 - 165:4 168:23 - 169:25 174:1 - 177:5 Foundation; relevance Foundation; relevance Speculation; compound; leading Foundation; hearsay; speculation; relevance Foundation; hearsay; speculation; relevance Speculation; legal conclusion; relevance Legal conclusion; relevance Speculation; relevance Foundation; relevance Relevance; leading Objection

34

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 35 of 40

21. NANCY SLATER-THOMPSON Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of April 21, 1999 161:1 - 164:25 Deposition Testimony Of April 22, 1999 240:3-15 240:16-25 242:1-25 243:1-23 Deposition Testimony Of June 13, 2002 8:11-15 94:4-15 96:17 - 99:6 101:11-19 106:1-25 107:1-17 107:18 - 108:23 109:3-15 109:16 - 110:9 111:13-21 112:4-15 112:16-23 125:9-17 159:7 - 160:2 162:1-11 Vague Legal conclusion Legal conclusion vague Foundation; vague Legal conclusion Legal conclusion; foundation Mischaracterizes prior testimony Legal conclusion Legal conclusion; vague Foundation Legal conclusion Vague Vague Legal conclusion Vague Hearsay; relevance Relevance Relevance Hearsay; relevance Relevance Objection

35

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 36 of 40

Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of April 21, 1999 54:19 - 58:7 73:19 - 74:13 132:18 - 133:13 165:1-13 176:11-25 195:16 - 199:9 Deposition Testimony Of April 22, 1999 237:6 - 239:3 Deposition Testimony Of June 13, 2002 105:3-25 92:19 - 93:20 119:4-17 149:9 - 153:21 158:18-6

22. LEROY STEWART Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of July 1, 2004 13:11 - 14:10 17:10-12 19:6 - 20:4 24:11 - 25:11 31:15 - 32:15 33:19 - 34:15 Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance; foundation; legal conclusion; best evidence Relevance; foundation; legal conclusion; best evidence Objection

36

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 37 of 40

35:5 - 36:9 40:14 - 41:6 41:17 - 42:21 69:1 - 70:3 73:7 - 74:19 80:22 - 84:7 84:16 - 85:5 88:3 - 92:14 94:14-20 105:11 - 106:4 117:21 - 119:7 121:11-22 129:18 - 131:14 134:15 - 135:2 137:1 - 141:19 144:12 - 152:2 161:18 - 162:1 162:17 - 163:1 166:7 - 167:18 169:14 - 170:22 176:15 - 177:19 178:15-21 180:12 - 181:8 185:14 - 186:3

Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation; legal conclusion Relevance; foundation; legal conclusion Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; speculative Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation Relevance; foundation; best evidence Relevance; foundation

37

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 38 of 40

Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of July 1, 2004 27:17 - 31:14 32:16 - 33:18 34:16 - 35:4 36:10-13 40:1-13 41:7-16 66:6 - 67:12 84:8-9 85:6-9 92:15 - 93:19 94:21 - 95:15 106:5 - 107:12 119:8 - 121:10 135:3-22 155:21 - 156:14 164:13 - 165:1 171:1-18 173:1-13 177:20 - 178:14 184:1 - 185:13

23. VICTOR TREBULES Objections: Designation Deposition Testimony Of April 17, 2002 10:18 - 11:19 15:17 - 16:17 17:7 - 18:17 52:11-22 Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance; foundation (not a 30(b)(6) witness); speculation; legal conclusion; best evidence Objection

38

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 39 of 40

60:8-14

Relevance; foundation (not a 30(b)(6) witness); legal conclusion; best evidence; incomplete Relevance; foundation; best evidence; incomplete Relevance; best evidence foundation (not a 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance; best evidence

143:5-12 170:9 - 171:16 180:7-22 Deposition Testimony Of April 18, 2002 18:10-21

Relevance; foundation (not a 30(b)(6) witness); legal conclusion; best evidence; vague Relevance; foundation (not a 30(b)(6) witness); legal conclusion; best evidence Relevance; foundation (not a 30(b)(6) witness); legal conclusion; best evidence

19:17 - 20:21 23:17 - 24:10 Deposition Testimony Of April 19, 2002 4:22 - 5:20 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony Of April 17, 2002 51:10 - 52:10 53:1 - 60:7 143:13 - 146:5 165:14 - 171:8 179:4 - 180:6 181:1 - 184:9 Deposition Testimony Of April 18, 2002 18:22 - 19:16 20:22 - 22:2 23:2-16 24:11 - 25:9

Relevance; legal conclusion; best evidence

39

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 316-2

Filed 05/20/2005

Page 40 of 40

Deposition Testimony Of April 19, 2002 5:21 - 8:19

24. FRANCIS YOUNG Objections: Designation Trial Testimony Of August 13, 2004 4:18 - 5:22 7:6-8 7:8 - 8:12 28:16 - 30:14 Counter-designations: Trial Testimony Of August 13, 2004 34:1 - 36:14 Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance; exceeds scope of direct Objection

40